» Articles » PMID: 39198788

Using PACS for Teaching Radiology to Undergraduate Medical Students

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 Aug 28
PMID 39198788
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Traditional radiology education for medical students predominantly uses textbooks, PowerPoint files, and hard-copy radiographic images, which often lack student interaction. PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) is a crucial tool for radiologists in viewing and reporting images, but its use in medical student training remains limited.

Objective: This study investigates the effectiveness of using PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) for teaching radiology to undergraduate medical students compared to traditional methods.

Methods: Fifty-three medical students were divided into a control group (25 students) receiving traditional slide-based training and an intervention group (28 students) using PACS software to view complete patient images. Pre- and post-course tests and satisfaction surveys were conducted for both groups, along with self-evaluation by the intervention group. The validity and reliability of the assessment tools were confirmed through expert review and pilot testing.

Results: No significant difference was found between the control and intervention groups regarding, gender, age, and GPA. Final multiple-choice test scores were similar (intervention: 10.89 ± 2.9; control: 10.76 ± 3.5; p = 0.883). However, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher improvement in the short answer test for image interpretation (intervention: 8.8 ± 2.28; control: 5.35 ± 2.39; p = 0.001). Satisfaction with the learning method did not significantly differ between groups (intervention: 36.54 ± 5.87; control: 39.44 ± 7.76; p = 0.129). The intervention group reported high familiarity with PACS capabilities (75%), CT principles (71.4%), interpretation (64.3%), appropriate window selection (75%), and anatomical relationships (85.7%).

Conclusion: PACS-based training enhances medical students' diagnostic and analytical skills in radiology. Further research with larger sample sizes and robust assessment methods is recommended to confirm and expand upon theses results.

References
1.
Branstetter 4th B, Humphrey A, Schumann J . The long-term impact of preclinical education on medical students' opinions about radiology. Acad Radiol. 2008; 15(10):1331-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.03.015. View

2.
Soman S, Amorosa J, Mueller L, Hu J, Zou L, Masand A . Evaluation of medical student experience using medical student created StudentPACS flash based PACS simulator tutorials for learning radiological topics. Acad Radiol. 2010; 17(6):799-807. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.01.016. View

3.
Reddy S, Straus C, McNulty N, Tigges S, Ayoob A, Randazzo W . Development of the AMSER standardized examinations in radiology for medical students. Acad Radiol. 2014; 22(1):130-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.07.018. View

4.
Bhogal P, Booth T, Phillips A, Golding S . Radiology in the undergraduate medical curriculum -- who, how, what, when, and where?. Clin Radiol. 2012; 67(12):1146-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.05.005. View

5.
Jang H, Oh C, Choe Y, Jang D . Use of dynamic images in radiology education: Movies of CT and MRI in the anatomy classroom. Anat Sci Educ. 2018; 11(6):547-553. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1793. View