» Articles » PMID: 39198771

Negotiating Grey Areas: an Interview-based Analysis of Paramedic Uncertainty and Decision-making in Cardiac Arrest Events

Overview
Journal BMC Emerg Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2024 Aug 28
PMID 39198771
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Paramedics are responsible for critical resuscitation decisions when attending Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA). Existing research indicates that a range of clinical and non-clinical factors moderate their decision-making. Within the United Kingdom (UK), there is little evidence on how and why paramedics make their decisions at actual OHCA events.

Methods: We explored the experiences of UK paramedics using individually recalled OHCA events as catalysts for discussion. Pen portraits developed from semi-structured interviews with 31 paramedics across two UK ambulance services were thematically analysed, enabling cross-participant comparisons whilst retaining depth and context.

Results: We identified four themes: uncertainties encountered in resuscitation guidelines, influences on decision-making, holistic perspectives, and indirect moderators. We found that paramedics experienced uncertainty at all stages of the resuscitation process. Uncertainties arose from indeterminate, ambiguous or complex information and were described as having both clinical and ethical dimensions. Whilst guidelines drove paramedics' decisions, non-clinical personal, practical and relational factors moderated their assessments of survivability and decision-making, with attitudes to interactions between patient age, frailty and quality of life playing a substantial role. Coping strategies such as uncertainty reduction, assumption-based reasoning and weighing pros and cons were evident from interviews.

Conclusions: The complexity of interactions between clinical and non-clinical factors points to an element of variability in paramedics' responses to uncertainty. Exploring UK paramedics' uncertainties and decision-making during specific OHCA events can help acknowledge and address uncertainties in resuscitation guidelines and paramedic training, providing paramedics with the tools to manage uncertainty in a consistent and transparent way.

References
1.
Druwe P, Monsieurs K, Piers R, Gagg J, Nakahara S, Alpert E . Perception of inappropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation by clinicians working in emergency departments and ambulance services: The REAPPROPRIATE international, multi-centre, cross sectional survey. Resuscitation. 2018; 132:112-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.006. View

2.
Mentzelopoulos S, Couper K, Van de Voorde P, Druwe P, Blom M, Perkins G . European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions. Resuscitation. 2021; 161:408-432. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017. View

3.
Sheard L, Marsh C . How to analyse longitudinal data from multiple sources in qualitative health research: the pen portrait analytic technique. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019; 19(1):169. PMC: 6679485. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0810-0. View

4.
Anderson N, Gott M, Slark J . Commence, continue, withhold or terminate?: a systematic review of decision-making in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016; 24(2):80-86. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000407. View

5.
Charlton K, Bate A . Factors that influence paramedic decision-making about resuscitation for treatment of out of hospital cardiac arrest: Results of a discrete choice experiment in National Health Service ambulance trusts in England and Wales. Resusc Plus. 2024; 17:100580. PMC: 10877159. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100580. View