» Articles » PMID: 39198359

Statistically Learned Associations Among Objects Bias Attention

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2024 Aug 28
PMID 39198359
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that semantic relationships among objects can influence the control of attention. There is also some evidence that learned associations among objects can bias attention. However, it is unclear whether these findings are due to statistical learning or existing semantic relationships. In the present study, we examined whether statistically learned associations among objects can bias attention in the absence of existing semantic relationships. Participants searched for one of four targets among pairs of novel shapes and identified whether the target was present or absent from the display. In an initial training phase, each target was paired with an associated distractor in a fixed spatial configuration. In a subsequent test phase, each target could be paired with the previously associated distractor or a different distractor. In our first experiment, the previously associated distractor was always presented in the same pair as the target. Participants were faster to respond when this distractor was present on target-present trials. In our second experiment, the previously associated distractor was presented in a different pair than the target in the test phase. In this case, participants were slower to respond when this distractor was present on both target-present and target-absent trials. Together, these findings provide clear evidence that statistically learned associations among objects can bias attention, analogous to the effects of semantic relationships on attention.

References
1.
Awh E, Belopolsky A, Theeuwes J . Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012; 16(8):437-43. PMC: 3426354. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010. View

2.
Bahle B, Kershner A, Hollingworth A . Categorical cuing: Object categories structure the acquisition of statistical regularities to guide visual search. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021; 150(12):2552-2566. PMC: 8497646. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001059. View

3.
Britton M, Anderson B . Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019; 46(3):324-334. PMC: 7456594. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000718. View

4.
Brockmole J, Castelhano M, Henderson J . Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(4):699-706. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.699. View

5.
Brockmole J, Henderson J . Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006; 59(7):1177-87. DOI: 10.1080/17470210600665996. View