Enhanced Soil Fertility and Carbon Sequestration in Urban Green Spaces Through the Application of Fe-Modified Biochar Combined with Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria

Overview

Journal Biology (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Aug 28

PMID 39194549

Authors

Guoyao Niu

Chiquan He

Shaohua Mao

Zongze Chen

Yangyang Ma

Yi Zhu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The soil of urban green spaces is severely degraded due to human activities during urbanization, and it is crucial to investigate effective measures that can restore the ecological functions of the soil. This study investigated the effects of plant growth promoting bacteria () and Fe-modified biochar on soil fertility increases and mechanisms of carbon sequestration. Additionally, the effects on C-cycling-related enzyme activity and the bacterial community were also explored. Six treatments included no biochar or suspension added (CK), only suspension (BC), only biochar (B), only Fe-modified biochar (FeB), biochar combined with (BBC), and Fe-modified biochar combined with (FeBBC). Compared with other treatments, the FeBBC treatment significantly decreased soil pH, alleviated soil alkalization, and increased the alkali-hydro nitrogen content in the soil. Compared to the individual application of FeB and BC, the FeBBC treatment significantly improved aggregates' stability and positively improved soil fertility and ecological function. Additionally, compared to the individual application of FeB and BC, the soil organic carbon (SOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) contents for the FeBBC-treated soil increased by 28.46~113.52%, 66.99~434.72%, and 7.34~10.04%, respectively. In the FeBBC treatment, FeB can improve soil physicochemical properties and provide bacterial attachment sites, increase the abundance and diversity of bacterial communities, and promote the uniform distribution of carbon-related bacteria in the soil. Compared to a single ecological restoration method, FeBBC treatment can improve soil fertility and carbon sequestration, providing important reference values for urban green space soil ecological restoration.

References

Guo Z, Kang Y, Wu H, Li M, Hu Z, Zhang J . Enhanced removal of phenanthrene and nutrients in wetland sediment with metallic biochar: Performance and mechanisms. Chemosphere. 2023; 327:138523. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138523. View

Bhanse P, Kumar M, Singh L, Awasthi M, Qureshi A . Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in boosting the phytoremediation of stressed soils: Opportunities, challenges, and prospects. Chemosphere. 2022; 303(Pt 1):134954. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134954. View

Nicolitch O, Feucherolles M, Churin J, Fauchery L, Turpault M, Uroz S . A microcosm approach highlights the response of soil mineral weathering bacterial communities to an increase of K and Mg availability. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):14403. PMC: 6779897. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50730-y. View

Sarfraz R, Hussain A, Sabir A, Ben Fekih I, Ditta A, Xing S . Role of biochar and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to enhance soil carbon sequestration-a review. Environ Monit Assess. 2019; 191(4):251. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7400-9. View

Wang S, Li T, Zheng Z, Chen H . Soil aggregate-associated bacterial metabolic activity and community structure in different aged tea plantations. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 654:1023-1032. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.032. View

Lin W, Fan F, Xu G, Gong K, Cheng X, Yuan X . Microbial community assembly responses to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination across water and sediment habitats in the Pearl River Estuary. J Hazard Mater. 2023; 457:131762. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131762. View

Wen E, Yang X, Chen H, Shaheen S, Sarkar B, Xu S . Iron-modified biochar and water management regime-induced changes in plant growth, enzyme activities, and phytoavailability of arsenic, cadmium and lead in a paddy soil. J Hazard Mater. 2020; 407:124344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124344. View

Colo J, Hajnal-Jafari T, duric S, Stamenov D, Hamidovic S . Plant growth promotion rhizobacteria in onion production. Pol J Microbiol. 2014; 63(1):83-8. View

Lu J, Yang Y, Liu P, Li Y, Huang F, Zeng L . Iron-montmorillonite treated corn straw biochar: Interfacial chemical behavior and stability. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 708:134773. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134773. View

10.

Zhang Y, Zhao C, Chen G, Zhou J, Chen Z, Li Z . Response of soil microbial communities to additions of straw biochar, iron oxide, and iron oxide-modified straw biochar in an arsenic-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020; 27(19):23761-23768. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08829-7. View

11.

Srivastava S, Bharti R, Verma P, Thakur I . Cloning and expression of gamma carbonic anhydrase from Serratia sp. ISTD04 for sequestration of carbon dioxide and formation of calcite. Bioresour Technol. 2015; 188:209-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.108. View

12.

Wu L, Zhang S, Wang J, Ding X . Phosphorus retention using iron (II/III) modified biochar in saline-alkaline soils: Adsorption, column and field tests. Environ Pollut. 2020; 261:114223. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114223. View

13.

Khatoon Z, Huang S, Rafique M, Fakhar A, Kamran M, Santoyo G . Unlocking the potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on soil health and the sustainability of agricultural systems. J Environ Manage. 2020; 273:111118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111118. View

14.

Khan M, Li D, Shah A, Huang J, Zhang L, Nunez-Delgado A . The impact of pristine and modified rice straw biochar on the emission of greenhouse gases from a red acidic soil. Environ Res. 2022; 208:112676. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112676. View

15.

Bao Z, Shi C, Tu W, Li L, Li Q . Recent developments in modification of biochar and its application in soil pollution control and ecoregulation. Environ Pollut. 2022; 313:120184. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120184. View

16.

Hu J, Dong H, Xu Q, Ling W, Qu J, Qiang Z . Impacts of water quality on the corrosion of cast iron pipes for water distribution and proposed source water switch strategy. Water Res. 2017; 129:428-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.065. View

17.

Tian J, Wang J, Dippold M, Gao Y, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y . Biochar affects soil organic matter cycling and microbial functions but does not alter microbial community structure in a paddy soil. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 556:89-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.010. View

18.

Yamada T, Sekiguchi Y . Cultivation of uncultured chloroflexi subphyla: significance and ecophysiology of formerly uncultured chloroflexi 'subphylum i' with natural and biotechnological relevance. Microbes Environ. 2011; 24(3):205-16. DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me09151s. View

19.

Zhu X, Chen B, Zhu L, Xing B . Effects and mechanisms of biochar-microbe interactions in soil improvement and pollution remediation: A review. Environ Pollut. 2017; 227:98-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.032. View

20.

Ibrahim M, Guo L, Wu F, Liu D, Zhang H, Zou S . Field-applied biochar-based MgO and sepiolite composites possess CO capture potential and alter organic C mineralization and C-cycling bacterial structure in fertilized soils. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 813:152495. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152495. View