» Articles » PMID: 39194498

Plasticity Comparison of Two Stem Cell Sources with Different Hox Gene Expression Profiles in Response to Cobalt Chloride Treatment During Chondrogenic Differentiation

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Aug 28
PMID 39194498
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The limited self-repair capacity of articular cartilage is a challenge for healing injuries. While mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are a promising approach for tissue regeneration, the criteria for selecting a suitable cell source remain undefined. To propose a molecular criterion, dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) with a -negative expression pattern and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs), which actively express genes, were differentiated towards chondrocytes in 3D pellets, employing a two-step protocol. The MSCs' response to preconditioning by cobalt chloride (CoCl), a hypoxia-mimicking agent, was explored in an assessment of the chondrogenic differentiation's efficiency using morphological, histochemical, immunohistochemical, and biochemical experiments. The preconditioned DPSC pellets exhibited significantly elevated levels of collagen II and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and reduced levels of the hypertrophic marker collagen X. No significant effect on GAGs production was observed in the preconditioned BMSC pellets, but collagen II and collagen X levels were elevated. While preconditioning did not modify the ALP specific activity in either cell type, it was notably lower in the DPSCs differentiated pellets compared to their BMSCs counterparts. These results could be interpreted as demonstrating the higher plasticity of DPSCs compared to BMSCs, suggesting the contribution of their unique molecular characteristics, including their negative expression pattern, to promote a chondrogenic differentiation potential. Consequently, DPSCs could be considered compelling candidates for future cartilage cell therapy.

References
1.
Miyazaki K, Kawamoto T, Tanimoto K, Nishiyama M, Honda H, Kato Y . Identification of functional hypoxia response elements in the promoter region of the DEC1 and DEC2 genes. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277(49):47014-21. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M204938200. View

2.
Liedtke S, Buchheiser A, Bosch J, Bosse F, Kruse F, Zhao X . The HOX Code as a "biological fingerprint" to distinguish functionally distinct stem cell populations derived from cord blood. Stem Cell Res. 2010; 5(1):40-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2010.03.004. View

3.
Hodge J, Decker H, Robinson J, Mellott A . Tissue-mimetic culture enhances mesenchymal stem cell secretome capacity to improve regenerative activity of keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. Wound Repair Regen. 2023; 31(3):367-383. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13076. View

4.
Asadi-Golshan R, Razban V, Mirzaei E, Rahmanian A, Khajeh S, Mostafavi-Pour Z . Efficacy of dental pulp-derived stem cells conditioned medium loaded in collagen hydrogel in spinal cord injury in rats: Stereological evidence. J Chem Neuroanat. 2021; 116:101978. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2021.101978. View

5.
Barber B, Rastegar M . Epigenetic control of Hox genes during neurogenesis, development, and disease. Ann Anat. 2010; 192(5):261-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.07.009. View