"Why Would We?" A Qualitative Study on COVID-19 Vaccination Decision Making Among Ukrainian Economic Female Migrants in Poland

Overview

Journal Front Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Aug 28

PMID 39193195

Authors

Maria Ganczak

Pawel Kalinowski

Piotr Twardowski

Dominika A Osicka

Oskar Pasek

Lukasz Duda-Duma

Johanna P M Vervoort

Michael Edelstein

Marta Kowalska

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Ukraine has one of the lowest COVID-19 vaccination rates in Europe. This may pose a significant epidemiological risk in the context of the refugee crisis and the fact that, since 2020, SARS-CoV-2 has been spreading and changing globally.

Objective: To evaluate determinants of vaccination decision making among Ukrainian female migrants (UFMs).

Methods: A qualitative study with 45 UFMs was conducted between December 2021 and January 2022. UFMs, from 2 Polish provinces, differing in age, education and length of stay were invited with the use of the snowball technique. Using a semi-structured topic guide, eight focus groups were conducted in person, recorded and transcribed. Thematic, qualitative analysis was made; key themes which emerged from the data (with the help of the Working Group Determinants of Vaccine Hesitancy Matrix), were related to contextual, individual/group and contextual vaccine/vaccination-specific influences.

Results: Mothers were found to be playing a crucial role in children and adolescent COVID-19 vaccine decision-making process. Universal trust in the Polish healthcare system and vaccination procedures, employer requirements and willingness to preserve jobs, desire to get back to normal and social influences were paramount prerequisites to let UFMs make a decision to get vaccinated. However, COVID-19 vaccines also faced backlash among UFMs. Negative experiences with vaccines provided in Ukraine, doubts about the rapid vaccine development, combined with lack of confidence in vaccine safety, specifically regarding child vaccination, might have a bearing on UFMs' decision about declining COVID-19 vaccine while on migration. Discrimination through HCWs during vaccination visits was also reported. Corrupted Ukrainian healthcare system, which facilitates proof forgery regarding vaccination certificates, could act as a negative influencer of UFMs' vaccine decision-making.

Conclusion: The results provide the novel information, expressed in economic UFMs' own words. Findings show that influencers of the decision-making process regarding the COVID-19 vaccination are complex and polarized; elements of hesitancy may persist after migration. Any continuation of UFMs' vaccination with COVID-19 vaccine should be subject to designing accessible information to address modifiable demotivators of the vaccine decision-making process identified in this study.

References

Robertson E, Reeve K, Niedzwiedz C, Moore J, Blake M, Green M . Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK household longitudinal study. Brain Behav Immun. 2021; 94:41-50. PMC: 7946541. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.03.008. View

Troiano G, Torchia G, Nardi A . Vaccine hesitancy among Ukrainian refugees. J Prev Med Hyg. 2023; 63(4):E566-E572. PMC: 9986985. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.4.2774. View

Bazylevych M . Vaccination campaigns in postsocialist Ukraine: health care providers navigating uncertainty. Med Anthropol Q. 2012; 25(4):436-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2011.01179.x. View

Daniel B, Murrell D . The role of women as past and present advocates for vaccinations: Relevance in the COVID-19 setting. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020; 7(2):228-229. PMC: 7648508. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.10.001. View

Hussain B, Latif A, Timmons S, Nkhoma K, Nellums L . Overcoming COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among ethnic minorities: A systematic review of UK studies. Vaccine. 2022; 40(25):3413-3432. PMC: 9046074. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.030. View

Gorman D, Bielecki K, Willocks L, Pollock K . A qualitative study of vaccination behaviour amongst female Polish migrants in Edinburgh, Scotland. Vaccine. 2019; 37(20):2741-2747. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.073. View

Vojtek I, Larson H, Plotkin S, Van Damme P . Evolving measles status and immunization policy development in six European countries. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022; 18(1):2031776. PMC: 9009904. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2031776. View

Matiashova L, Isayeva G, Shanker A, Tsagkaris C, Aborode A, Essar M . COVID-19 vaccination in Ukraine: An update on the status of vaccination and the challenges at hand. J Med Virol. 2021; 93(9):5252-5253. PMC: 8242568. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27091. View

Malchrzak W, Mastalerz-Migas A, Sroka Z, Spiegel M . One Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. What Do We Know and What Is Yet to Come? - The Summarising Review. Int J Public Health. 2021; 66:1603975. PMC: 8475762. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1603975. View

10.

Francis J, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles M . What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010; 25(10):1229-45. DOI: 10.1080/08870440903194015. View

11.

Badur S, Ota M, Ozturk S, Adegbola R, Dutta A . Vaccine confidence: the keys to restoring trust. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020; 16(5):1007-1017. PMC: 7227637. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1740559. View

12.

Purvis R, Moore R, Willis D, Hallgren E, McElfish P . Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among hesitant adopters in the United States. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022; 18(6):2114701. PMC: 9746519. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2114701. View

13.

Saag M . Wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles: the unprecedented speed of COVID-19 science. Physiol Rev. 2022; 102(3):1569-1577. PMC: 9169823. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00010.2022. View

14.

Fojnica A, Osmanovic A, duzic N, Fejzic A, Mekic E, Gromilic Z . COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and rejection in an adult population in Bosnia and Herzegovina. PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0264754. PMC: 8884480. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264754. View

15.

Carson S, Casillas A, Castellon-Lopez Y, Mansfield L, Morris D, Barron J . COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-making Factors in Racial and Ethnic Minority Communities in Los Angeles, California. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(9):e2127582. PMC: 8485164. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27582. View

16.

MacDonald N . Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015; 33(34):4161-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036. View

17.

Naqvi M, Li L, Woodrow M, Yadav P, Kostkova P . Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Ethnic Minorities Groups in the UK. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:917242. PMC: 9284000. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917242. View

18.

Abba-Aji M, Stuckler D, Galea S, Mckee M . Ethnic/racial minorities' and migrants' access to COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators. J Migr Health. 2022; 5:100086. PMC: 8855618. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100086. View

19.

Ganczak M, Bielecki K, Drozd-Dabrowska M, Topczewska K, Biesiada D, Molas-Biesiada A . Vaccination concerns, beliefs and practices among Ukrainian migrants in Poland: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):93. PMC: 7789884. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10105-9. View

20.

Ganczak M, Kalinowski P, Pasek O, Duda-Duma L, Sobieraj E, Golawski J . Health System Barriers to Child Mandatory and Optional Vaccination among Ukrainian Migrants in Poland in the Context of MMR and HPV Vaccines-A Qualitative Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(1). PMC: 9819946. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010712. View