Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Among Otolaryngologists in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Overview

Journal J Multidiscip Healthc

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 Aug 27

PMID 39188810

Authors

Salma S AlSharhan

Wasan F ALMarzouq

Hamzah K Alshaikh

Hussain J Aljubran

Rizam Alghamdi

Sarah M AlQahtani

Aseel F Almarzouq

Naheel A AlAmer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Otolaryngology has experienced notable advancements and growth in the application of artificial intelligence (AI). However, otolaryngologists' perception of these tools are lacking. This study aims to assess the knowledge and attitudes of otolaryngologists toward AI.

Patients And Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 110 otolaryngologists in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. A piloted questionnaire was used to gather information on knowledge, attitude, and opinions regarding AI. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26.

Results: Of the sample, 60% indicated average perceived knowledge of AI, while approximately 44.5% perceived their AI knowledge in the field of otolaryngology to be below average. A significant positive correlation was identified between knowledge and attitude scores. It was found that a higher knowledge score was more closely associated with seeing more than 15 patients per day, while a higher attitude score was more closely associated with being older, being a consultant, and having more years of professional experience. Of the sample, 38.2% strongly agreed that the application of AI in scientific research should be included in the residency training program.

Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of incorporating AI tools into certain aspects of the otolaryngology residency training program, highlighting their significance.

References

Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I . Machine Learning in Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(14):1347-1358. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1814259. View

Gunasekeran D, Zheng F, Lim G, Chong C, Zhang S, Ng W . Acceptance and Perception of Artificial Intelligence Usability in Eye Care (APPRAISE) for Ophthalmologists: A Multinational Perspective. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:875242. PMC: 9612721. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.875242. View

Alshehri S, Alahmari K, Alasiry A . A Comprehensive Evaluation of AI-Assisted Diagnostic Tools in ENT Medicine: Insights and Perspectives from Healthcare Professionals. J Pers Med. 2024; 14(4). PMC: 11051468. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040354. View

Tama B, Kim D, Kim G, Kim S, Lee S . Recent Advances in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 13(4):326-339. PMC: 7669308. DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2020.00654. View

Silver D, Huang A, Maddison C, Guez A, Sifre L, Van Den Driessche G . Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature. 2016; 529(7587):484-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature16961. View

Civaner M, Uncu Y, Bulut F, Giounous Chalil E, Tatli A . Artificial intelligence in medical education: a cross-sectional needs assessment. BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):772. PMC: 9646274. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03852-3. View

Bing D, Ying J, Miao J, Lan L, Wang D, Zhao L . Predicting the hearing outcome in sudden sensorineural hearing loss via machine learning models. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018; 43(3):868-874. DOI: 10.1111/coa.13068. View

Valikodath N, Al-Khaled T, Cole E, Ting D, Tu E, Campbell J . Evaluation of pediatric ophthalmologists' perspectives of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology. J AAPOS. 2021; 25(3):164.e1-164.e5. PMC: 8328946. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.01.011. View

Formeister E, Baum R, Knott P, Seth R, Ha P, Ryan W . Machine Learning for Predicting Complications in Head and Neck Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer. Laryngoscope. 2020; 130(12):E843-E849. DOI: 10.1002/lary.28508. View

10.

Lau K, Wilkinson J, Moorthy R . A web-based prediction score for head and neck cancer referrals. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018; 43(4):1043-1049. DOI: 10.1111/coa.13098. View

11.

Wartman S, Combs C . Medical Education Must Move From the Information Age to the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Acad Med. 2017; 93(8):1107-1109. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002044. View

12.

Crowson M, Ranisau J, Eskander A, Babier A, Xu B, Kahmke R . A contemporary review of machine learning in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope. 2019; 130(1):45-51. DOI: 10.1002/lary.27850. View

13.

Wu Y, Ho H, Hsiao S, Brummet R, Chipara O . Predicting three-month and 12-month post-fitting real-world hearing-aid outcome using pre-fitting acceptable noise level (ANL). Int J Audiol. 2016; 55(5):285-94. PMC: 4823154. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1120892. View

14.

Nam Y, Choo O, Lee Y, Choung Y, Shin H . Cascade recurring deep networks for audible range prediction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017; 17(Suppl 1):56. PMC: 5444043. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0452-2. View

15.

Scheetz J, Rothschild P, McGuinness M, Hadoux X, Soyer H, Janda M . A survey of clinicians on the use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology, dermatology, radiology and radiation oncology. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):5193. PMC: 7933437. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84698-5. View

16.

Pfeifer C . A progressive three-phase innovation to medical education in the United States. Med Educ Online. 2018; 23(1):1427988. PMC: 5795774. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1427988. View

17.

Webster C . Artificial intelligence and the adoption of new technology in medical education. Med Educ. 2020; 55(1):6-7. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14409. View

18.

Bramhall N, McMillan G, Kujawa S, Konrad-Martin D . Use of non-invasive measures to predict cochlear synapse counts. Hear Res. 2018; 370:113-119. PMC: 7161203. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.10.006. View

19.

Nasca T, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn T . The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(11):1051-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsr1200117. View

20.

Altuwaijri M, Bahanshal A, Almehaid M . Implementation of computerized physician order entry in National Guard Hospitals: assessment of critical success factors. J Family Community Med. 2011; 18(3):143-51. PMC: 3237203. DOI: 10.4103/2230-8229.90014. View