» Articles » PMID: 39187979

Technical Note: Assessing GPS Sensor Accuracy Using Real-time Kinematic Device for Livestock Tracking

Overview
Journal J Anim Sci
Date 2024 Aug 27
PMID 39187979
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The technical aspects of global positioning system (GPS) sensors have been improved substantially over the years, making them valuable and popular tools for livestock tracking. Using GPS sensors allows producers and researchers to locate grazing livestock, monitor their behavior and distribution, and gather referencing information about the health status of the animals and pastures. However, interpreting the behavior of grazing livestock, such as cattle, from GPS data can be difficult due to positioning inaccuracies. Without knowing the positioning accuracy range of GPS sensors, achieving high-level confidence in determining grazing densities and identifying abnormal livestock movement patterns is challenging. In this study, the positioning accuracy of 3 different types of commercial GPS sensors was assessed using a survey-grade real-time kinematics (RTK) device. We outlined the procedures and essential equations and compared the recorded locations from the GPS sensors with reference locations collected from the RTK device. The results demonstrated statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in positioning accuracy between different types of GPS sensors. The circular error probable (CEP) at 95% probability levels (CEP95) of the 3 sensors ranged from 2.46 to 11.06 m. This accuracy varied among individual sensors within the same brand and across different brands, which underscores the importance of evaluating the positioning accuracy of GPS sensors in livestock tracking. This study provides significant insights for animal scientists, ecologists, and livestock producers engaged in GPS sensor-related research and practices.

References
1.
Aquilani C, Confessore A, Bozzi R, Sirtori F, Pugliese C . Review: Precision Livestock Farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems. Animal. 2021; 16(1):100429. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100429. View

2.
Dore K, Hansen M, Klegarth A, Fichtel C, Koch F, Springer A . Review of GPS collar deployments and performance on nonhuman primates. Primates. 2020; 61(3):373-387. PMC: 8118416. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-020-00793-7. View

3.
Bailey D . Management strategies for optimal grazing distribution and use of arid rangelands. J Anim Sci. 2004; 82 E-Suppl:E147-153. DOI: 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE147x. View

4.
Kays R, Crofoot M, Jetz W, Wikelski M . ECOLOGY. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science. 2015; 348(6240):aaa2478. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa2478. View

5.
Augustine D, Derner J . Assessing herbivore foraging behavior with GPS collars in a semiarid grassland. Sensors (Basel). 2013; 13(3):3711-23. PMC: 3658770. DOI: 10.3390/s130303711. View