» Articles » PMID: 39187653

Inter- and Intra-observer Agreement of the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System in Patients Undergoing (Infra)Popliteal Endovascular Interventions

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Peripheral arterial calcification is an important predictor of outcomes after both conservative and endovascular treatment. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-based calcification scores are limited by low sensitivity and inter-observer agreement. The Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) assesses the severity of target lesion calcification. The newly introduced modified PACSS (mPACSS) also evaluates target vessel calcification. This study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of PACSS and mPACSS on computed tomography angiography (CTA) in (infra)popliteal endovascular interventions.

Methods: A random sample of 50 limbs from the prospective multicenter Dutch Chronic Lower Limb-Threatening Ischemia Registry (THRILLER) were included. Three experienced independent raters scored PACSS on CTA. Three months later, one blinded rater assessed the same 50 CTA scans, keeping track of assessment time. The reliability of the original 5-step PACSS, a simplified binary PACSS (0-2 vs 3-4) and the 7-step mPACSS were tested using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa statistics.

Results: In total, 50 limbs (mean age 70.1 ± 11.0, 29 men) with 41 popliteal and 40 infrapopliteal lesions were scored. Inter-observer agreement of PACSS and binary PACSS were moderate (κ = 0.60) and substantial (κ = 0.72), respectively, while intra-observer agreement was almost perfect in both scores (κ = 0.86). Inter- and intra-observer agreement of mPACSS were moderate (κ = 0.48) and substantial (κ = 0.77), respectively. Mean assessment time for an experienced rater was 3.43 ± 0.93 min per CTA scan.

Conclusion: Both the semi-quantitative PACSS and mPACSS scores for (infra)popliteal arteries can be performed reliably on pre-operative CTA.

References
1.
Song P, Rudan D, Zhu Y, Fowkes F, Rahimi K, Fowkes F . Global, regional, and national prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2015: an updated systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019; 7(8):e1020-e1030. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30255-4. View

2.
Baumann F, Engelberger R, Willenberg T, Do D, Kalka C, Baumgartner I . Infrapopliteal lesion morphology in patients with critical limb ischemia: implications for the development of anti-restenosis technologies. J Endovasc Ther. 2013; 20(2):149-56. DOI: 10.1583/1545-1550-20.2.149. View

3.
Rocha-Singh K, Zeller T, Jaff M . Peripheral arterial calcification: prevalence, mechanism, detection, and clinical implications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 83(6):E212-20. PMC: 4262070. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25387. View

4.
Huang C, Wu I, Wu Y, Hwang J, Wang S, Chen W . Association of lower extremity arterial calcification with amputation and mortality in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e90201. PMC: 3936008. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090201. View

5.
Kang I, Lee W, Choi B, Choi D, Hong M, Jang Y . Semiquantitative assessment of tibial artery calcification by computed tomography angiography and its ability to predict infrapopliteal angioplasty outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2016; 64(5):1335-1343. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.047. View