» Articles » PMID: 39183975

Effect of Eight-week High-intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-intensity Continuous Training Programme on Body Composition, Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Sedentary Adolescents

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2024 Aug 26
PMID 39183975
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess and compare the effect of an 8-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) programme on body composition and cardiovascular metabolic outcomes of sedentary adolescents in China.

Methods: Eighteen sedentary normal-weight adolescents (age: 18.5 ± 0.3 years, 11 females) were randomized into three groups. HIIT group protocol consisted of three sessions/week for 8-week of "all out" sprints to reach 85%-95% of HR, and MICT group protocol undertook three sessions/week for 8-week of continuous running to reach 65%-75% of HR. The control group resumed normal daily activities without any intervention. Blood pressure and body composition were measured, and fasting blood samples were obtained at baseline and 48 h post-trial. Mixed-design ANOVA analysis was employed followed by t-tests and Bonferroni alpha-correction was used to evaluate interaction, between-group, and within-group differences, respectively.

Results: Results indicated that HIIT and MICT similarly affected body fat mass ( = 0.021, ES = 0.19; = 0.016, ES = 0.30, respectively), body fat percentage ( = 0.037, ES = 0.17; = 0.041, ES = 0.28, respectively), visceral fat area ( = 0.001, ES = 0.35; = 0.003, ES = 0.49, respectively) of body composition. A positive outcome was observed for waist/hip ratio ( = 0.033, ES = 0.43) in HIIT, but not MICT ( = 0.163, ES = 0.33). No significant differences were found between groups for any clinical biomarkers. However, pairwise comparison within the group showed a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure ( = 0.018, ES = 0.84), diastolic blood pressure ( = 0.008, ES = 1.76), and triglyceride ( = 0.004, ES = 1.33) in HIIT, but no significant differences were found in the MICT and Control group.

Conclusion: Both 8-week HIIT and MICT programmes have similar positive effects on reducing body fat mass, fat percentage, and visceral fat area. However, sedentary adolescents may have limited scope to decrease insulin resistance after these 8-week interventions. Notably, the 8-week HIIT intervention was highly effective in increasing cardiometabolic health compared to the MICT. The exercise intensity threshold value and metabolic outcomes of high-intensity interval sprints should be explored further to extend the long-term benefit in this cohort.

Citing Articles

Impact of combined high-intensity bodyweight interval training and breathing exercise on cardiometabolic health in normal-weight middle-aged adults with hypertension.

Herawati I, Mat Ludin A, Ishak I, Mutalazimah M, Farah N BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):962.

PMID: 40069690 PMC: 11895283. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-22139-y.


Concurrent Effects of Plyometric Interval Training Implemented in Physical Education Lessons on Adolescent Power and Endurance: An Analysis of Responder Prevalence.

Kozlenia D, Kochan-Jachec K, Domaradzki J Sports (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39852610 PMC: 11768485. DOI: 10.3390/sports13010015.

References
1.
Alvarez C, Ramirez-Campillo R, Ramirez-Velez R, Izquierdo M . Effects of 6-Weeks High-Intensity Interval Training in Schoolchildren with Insulin Resistance: Influence of Biological Maturation on Metabolic, Body Composition, Cardiovascular and Performance Non-responses. Front Physiol. 2017; 8:444. PMC: 5489677. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00444. View

2.
Esquivel Zuniga R, DeBoer M . Prediabetes in Adolescents: Prevalence, Management and Diabetes Prevention Strategies. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021; 14:4609-4619. PMC: 8629936. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S284401. View

3.
Ingul C, Dias K, Tjonna A, Follestad T, Hosseini M, Timilsina A . Effect of High Intensity Interval Training on Cardiac Function in Children with Obesity: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018; 61(2):214-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.01.012. View

4.
Nigro J, Osman N, Dart A, Little P . Insulin resistance and atherosclerosis. Endocr Rev. 2006; 27(3):242-59. DOI: 10.1210/er.2005-0007. View

5.
Paniagua O, Bryant M, Panza J . Role of endothelial nitric oxide in shear stress-induced vasodilation of human microvasculature: diminished activity in hypertensive and hypercholesterolemic patients. Circulation. 2001; 103(13):1752-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.13.1752. View