» Articles » PMID: 39183532

Utilization of a Novel Scoring System in Predicting 30-day Mortality in Acute Pulmonary Embolism, the CLOT-5 Pilot Study

Abstract

Objectives: To construct a new scoring system utilizing biomarkers, vitals, and imaging data to predict 30-day mortality in acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

Background: Acute PE, a well-known manifestation of venous thromboembolic disease, is responsible for over 100,000 deaths worldwide yearly. Contemporary management algorithms rely on a multidisciplinary approach to care via PE response teams (PERT) in the identification of low, intermediate, and high-risk patients. The PESI and sPESI scores have been used as cornerstones of the triage process in assigning risk of 30-day mortality for patients presenting with acute PE; however, the specificity of these scoring systems has often come into question.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 488 patients with acute PE who were managed at a tertiary care institution with either conservative therapy consisting of low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin, advanced therapies consisting of catheter directed therapies, aspiration thrombectomy, or a combination of these therapies, or surgical embolectomy. The CLOT-5 score was designed to include vital signs, biomarkers, and imaging data to predict 30-day mortality in patients presenting with acute PE.

Results: The CLOT-5 score had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.901 with a standard error of 0.29, while the PESI and sPESI scores had an AUC and standard errors of 0.793 ±- 0.43 and 0.728 ± 0.55, respectively.

Conclusions: When incorporated into the management algorithms of national PERT programs, the CLOT-5 score may allow for rapid and comprehensive assessment of patients with acute PE at high risk for clinical decompensation, leading to early escalation of care where appropriate.

Citing Articles

From Cell Interactions to Bedside Practice: Complete Blood Count-Derived Biomarkers with Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential in Venous Thromboembolism.

Murariu-Gligor E, Muresan S, Cotoi O J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797287 PMC: 11721038. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010205.

References
1.
Jimenez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, Gomez V, Lobo J, Uresandi F . Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(15):1383-9. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.199. View

2.
Yuriditsky E, Mitchell O, Sibley R, Xia Y, Sista A, Zhong J . Low left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral is associated with poor outcomes in acute pulmonary embolism. Vasc Med. 2019; 25(2):133-140. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X19880268. View

3.
Galmer A, Weinberg I, Giri J, Jaff M, Weinberg M . The Role of the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: How to Build One, Who to Include, Scenarios, Organization, and Algorithms. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 20(3):216-223. DOI: 10.1053/j.tvir.2017.07.012. View

4.
Galeano-Valle F, Ordieres-Ortega L, Oblitas C, Del-Toro-Cervera J, Alvarez-Sala-Walther L, Demelo-Rodriguez P . Inflammatory Biomarkers in the Short-Term Prognosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(5). PMC: 7961591. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052627. View

5.
Pruszczyk P, Goliszek S, Lichodziejewska B, Kostrubiec M, Ciurzynski M, Kurnicka K . Prognostic value of echocardiography in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 7(6):553-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.11.004. View