Short Inter-pregnancy Interval and Birthweight: a Reappraisal Based on a Follow-up Study of All Women in Norway with Two Singleton Deliveries During 1970-2019

Overview

Journal Eur J Epidemiol

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Aug 23

PMID 39179945

Authors

Anne Eskild

Irene Skau

Camilla Haavaldsen

Ola Didrik Saugstad

Jostein Grytten

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We studied mean changes in birthweight from the first to the second delivery according to length of the inter-pregnancy interval. We also studied recurrence risk of low birthweight, preterm birth and perinatal death. We followed all women in Norway from their first to their second singleton delivery at gestational week 22 or beyond during the years 1970-2019, a total of 654 100 women. Data were obtained from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Mean birthweight increased from the first to the second delivery, and the increase was highest in pregnancies conceived < 6 months after the first delivery; adjusted mean birthweight increase 227 g (g) (95% CI; 219-236 g), 90 g higher than in pregnancies conceived 6-11 months after the first delivery (137 g (95% CI; 130-144 g)). After exclusion of women with a first stillbirth, the mean increase in birthweight at inter-pregnancy interval < 6 months was attenuated (152 g, 95% CI; 143-160 g), but remained higher than at longer inter-pregnancy intervals. This finding was particularly prominent in women > 35 years (218 g, 95% CI; 139 -298 g). In women with a first live born infant weighing < 2500 g, mean birthweight increased by around 1000 g to the second delivery, and the increase was most prominent at < 6 months inter-pregnancy interval. We found increased recurrence risk of preterm birth at inter-pregnancy interval < 6 months, but no increased recurrence risk of low birthweight, small for gestational age infant or perinatal death. In conclusion, we found the highest mean increase in birthweight when the inter-pregnancy interval was short. Our results do not generally discourage short pregnancy intervals.

References

Wong L, Schliep K, Silver R, Mumford S, Perkins N, Ye A . The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 212(3):375.e1-11. PMC: 4346440. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.020. View

Ahrens K, Hutcheon J . Advancing the methodological quality of studies on short birth spacing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Where to next?. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021; 35(4):389-391. DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12797. View

Ziauddeen N, Roderick P, Macklon N, Alwan N . The duration of the interpregnancy interval in multiparous women and maternal weight gain between pregnancies: findings from a UK population-based cohort. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):9175. PMC: 6591402. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45595-0. View

Garg B, Darney B, Pilliod R, Caughey A . Long and short interpregnancy intervals increase severe maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 225(3):331.e1-331.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.013. View

Trogstad L, Eskild A, Magnus P, Samuelsen S, Nesheim B . Changing paternity and time since last pregnancy; the impact on pre-eclampsia risk. A study of 547 238 women with and without previous pre-eclampsia. Int J Epidemiol. 2002; 30(6):1317-22. DOI: 10.1093/ije/30.6.1317. View

Eijkemans M, van Poppel F, Habbema D, Smith K, Leridon H, Te Velde E . Too old to have children? Lessons from natural fertility populations. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(6):1304-12. PMC: 4389129. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu056. View

Mahendru A, Foo F, McEniery C, Everett T, Wilkinson I, Lees C . Change in maternal cardiac output from preconception to mid-pregnancy is associated with birth weight in healthy pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 49(1):78-84. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17368. View

de Weger F, Hukkelhoven C, Serroyen J, Te Velde E, Smits L . Advanced maternal age, short interpregnancy interval, and perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204(5):421.e1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.008. View

Strom-Roum E, Jukic A, Eskild A . Offspring birthweight and placental weight-does the type of maternal diabetes matter? A population-based study of 319 076 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021; 100(10):1885-1892. PMC: 9486683. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14217. View

10.

Wilcox A . On the importance--and the unimportance--of birthweight. Int J Epidemiol. 2002; 30(6):1233-41. DOI: 10.1093/ije/30.6.1233. View

11.

Gardosi J, Francis A . Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201(1):28.e1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.034. View

12.

Villamor E, Cnattingius S . Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006; 368(9542):1164-70. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69473-7. View

13.

Ahrens K, Nelson H, Stidd R, Moskosky S, Hutcheon J . Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018; 33(1):O25-O47. PMC: 7379643. DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12503. View

14.

Tessema G, Haberg S, Pereira G, Regan A, Dunne J, Magnus M . Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008-2016): A cohort study. PLoS Med. 2022; 19(11):e1004129. PMC: 9681073. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004129. View

15.

Hanley G, Hutcheon J, Kinniburgh B, Lee L . Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129(3):408-415. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891. View

16.

Khoshnood B, Lee K, Wall S, Hsieh H, Mittendorf R . Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 148(8):798-805. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009701. View

17.

Eskild A, Sommerfelt S, Skau I, Grytten J . Offspring birthweight and placental weight in immigrant women from conflict-zone countries; does length of residence in the host country matter? A population study in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019; 99(5):615-622. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13777. View

18.

Levine R, Maynard S, Qian C, Lim K, England L, Yu K . Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(7):672-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa031884. View

19.

Noori M, Donald A, Angelakopoulou A, Hingorani A, Williams D . Prospective study of placental angiogenic factors and maternal vascular function before and after preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Circulation. 2010; 122(5):478-87. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.895458. View

20.

DeFranco E, Seske L, Greenberg J, Muglia L . Influence of interpregnancy interval on neonatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 212(3):386.e1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.017. View