» Articles » PMID: 39167703

Reevaluating the Role of Platinum-based Chemotherapy in the Evolving Treatment Landscape for Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Aug 21
PMID 39167703
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the standard first-line (1L) treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) for decades, based on the proven efficacy and established safety profiles of cisplatin- and carboplatin-based regimens. With the emergence of novel regimens, it is important to reevaluate and contextualize the role of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab 1L maintenance in patients without disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy was established as a standard 1L regimen based on the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase III trial. More recently, the EV-302 phase III trial showed the superiority of 1L enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy, and the Checkmate 901 phase III trial showed the superiority of 1L nivolumab + cisplatin/gemcitabine versus cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. These 2 regimens have now been included as standard 1L options in treatment guidelines for advanced UC. EV + pembrolizumab is now the preferred 1L treatment, and in locations where EV + pembrolizumab is not available or individual patients are not considered suitable, recommended options are platinum-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance or nivolumab + cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In this review, we discuss current treatment options for advanced UC recommended in guidelines, practical considerations with platinum-based chemotherapy, the role of avelumab 1L maintenance, recent phase III trials of EV + pembrolizumab and nivolumab + cisplatin/gemcitabine, safety profiles of recommended 1L treatments, and second-line treatment options.

Citing Articles

Evolving Treatment Landscape of Frontline Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Insights and Future Perspectives.

Kwon W, Lee M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39682263 PMC: 11640162. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234078.

References
1.
Morales-Barrera R, Bellmunt J, Suarez C, Valverde C, Guix M, Serrano C . Cisplatin and gemcitabine administered every two weeks in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and impaired renal function. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(12):1816-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.002. View

2.
Sternberg C, De Mulder P, Schornagel J, Theodore C, Fossa S, Van Oosterom A . Seven year update of an EORTC phase III trial of high-dose intensity M-VAC chemotherapy and G-CSF versus classic M-VAC in advanced urothelial tract tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2005; 42(1):50-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.032. View

3.
Grande E, Arranz J, De Santis M, Bamias A, Kikuchi E, Garcia Del Muro X . Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor130): final overall survival analysis results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2023; 25(1):29-45. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00540-5. View

4.
Laukhtina E, Mori K, Mostafaei H, Merseburger A, Nyirady P, Moschini M . Adverse events of different chemotherapy regimens in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Semin Oncol. 2021; 48(3):181-192. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2021.09.005. View

5.
Izumi K, Iwamoto H, Yaegashi H, Shigehara K, Nohara T, Kadono Y . Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Split Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin for Advanced Urothelial Cancer With Cisplatin-unfit Renal Function. In Vivo. 2018; 33(1):167-172. PMC: 6364082. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11454. View