» Articles » PMID: 39161743

Closing the Loop: Strengthening Course Quality of Pharm.D. Program Via Applying a Comprehensive Four-step Review Approach

Overview
Journal Saudi Pharm J
Specialty Pharmacy
Date 2024 Aug 20
PMID 39161743
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explores the course review process implemented by the College of Pharmacy at King Saud University for its Pharm.D. program. Through a qualitative research design, a dedicated course review committee was established to oversee the evaluation process. The committee gathered and analyzed data from various sources, including course reports, student evaluations, and exam center reports, to achieve a holistic understanding of each course's effectiveness. The evaluation process was structured into a Four-Step Course Evaluation Approach: data collection, data review and recommendations, taking appropriate action, and communicating the outcomes. The "closing the loop" stage ensured that recommendations were effectively implemented, and course evaluation data were systematically archived for future reference. The results of this study, based on the evaluation of 25 courses, revealed significant improvements in course quality, alignment with program learning outcomes, and adherence to accreditation standards. Key findings included the identification of gaps and discrepancies, leading to targeted interventions and enhanced course content. Overall, this study highlights the effectiveness of a structured course review process in enhancing the quality of education and ensuring continuous improvement within the college. The committee focuses on refining evaluation criteria, conducting workshops, and providing training to stay current with emerging accreditation standards and best practices. This systematic course review process demonstrates the College's commitment to providing high-quality education and preparing students for successful careers in pharmacy, with significant implications for the improvement of pharmacy education and the overall student learning experience.

References
1.
Nelson N, Carlson R, Corbett A, Williams D, Rhoney D . Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review. Pharmacy (Basel). 2021; 9(2). PMC: 8167641. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy9020091. View

2.
Wolters M, van Paassen J, Minjon L, Hempenius M, Blokzijl M, Blom L . Design of a Pharmacy Curriculum on Patient Centered Communication Skills. Pharmacy (Basel). 2021; 9(1). PMC: 7838998. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy9010022. View

3.
Kirwin J, Miller D, DiVall M . Lessons Learned from Evaluating a Process for Systematic Curriculum Review. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019; 83(1):6783. PMC: 6418851. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6783. View

4.
Aljadhey H, Asiri Y, Albogami Y, Spratto G, Alshehri M . Pharmacy education in Saudi Arabia: A vision of the future. Saudi Pharm J. 2017; 25(1):88-92. PMC: 5310142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.02.001. View

5.
Fathelrahman A, Alrobaian M, Altowayan W, Maghrabi I, Asiri Y . Pharmacy education in Saudi Arabia: Achievements and challenges during the last two decades with a focus on Taif University as a case study. Saudi Pharm J. 2022; 30(6):649-654. PMC: 9257849. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.04.001. View