» Articles » PMID: 39160438

Development and Validation of the UHPLC-MS/MS Method for the Quantitative Determination of 25 PFAS in Dried Blood Spots

Overview
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2024 Aug 19
PMID 39160438
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are anthropogenic fluorine-containing compounds largely used in industrial and consumer applications. They tend to bioaccumulate in the human body after intake from various sources in daily life. Following repeated exposure to PFAS, a broad range of adverse health outcomes has been reported. Consequently, monitoring PFAS levels in human blood is of paramount importance for public health policies. In contrast with traditional venipuncture, dried blood spots (DBS) constitute a reliable, cheap, and less invasive technique to allow microsampling by capillary blood collected on a specific device. This work aimed to develop and validate an innovative analytical method, combining quantitative DBS with UHPLC-MS/MS instrumentation to identify and quantify 25 PFAS. The extraction procedure was developed and optimized within the range 2-100 ng/mL. Specifically, fortified blood was applied on Capitainer®B devices providing 10 μL of blood volume through a microfluidic channel. After 3 h of drying, the extraction was performed by methanol under sonication, followed by centrifugation. Then, the extraction solvent was evaporated; the residue was reconstituted with the mobile phase solution. The validated method evidenced good sensitivity, with limits of detection ranging from 0.4 ng/mL (PFODA, PFOS) to 1.0 ng/mL (PFOA, 3,6-OPFHpA). The ± 20% acceptability criteria established for intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were fulfilled for all analytes. High recovery-above 80%-was recorded, whereas significant matrix effect resulted in ion enhancement (> 50%) for 13 analytes. In conclusion, the proposed workflow proved to be reliable, fit for purpose, and easily adaptable in the laboratory routine.

Citing Articles

Regulating the surface chemistry of covalent organic frameworks for enhancement cationic dye removal and identification.

Zhou X, Lei W, Qin X, Lai X, Hu K, Zhao S Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 417(4):675-685.

PMID: 39648228 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05687-x.

References
1.
Gu H, Liu G, Wang J, Aubry A, Arnold M . Selecting the correct weighting factors for linear and quadratic calibration curves with least-squares regression algorithm in bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays and impacts of using incorrect weighting factors on curve stability, data quality, and assay.... Anal Chem. 2014; 86(18):8959-66. DOI: 10.1021/ac5018265. View

2.
Brase R, Mullin E, Spink D . Legacy and Emerging Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Analytical Techniques, Environmental Fate, and Health Effects. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(3). PMC: 7863963. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22030995. View

3.
Ehresman D, Froehlich J, Olsen G, Chang S, Butenhoff J . Comparison of human whole blood, plasma, and serum matrices for the determination of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), and other fluorochemicals. Environ Res. 2006; 103(2):176-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.008. View

4.
Jobst K, Arora A, Pollitt K, Sled J . Dried blood spots for the identification of bio-accumulating organic compounds: current challenges and future perspectives. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 2020; 15:66-73. PMC: 7560987. DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2020.07.001. View

5.
Carignan C, Bauer R, Patterson A, Phomsopha T, Redman E, Stapleton H . Self-Collection Blood Test for PFASs: Comparing Volumetric Microsamplers with a Traditional Serum Approach. Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(21):7950-7957. PMC: 10233751. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c09852. View