Surgical Residents' Perception of Feedback on Their Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Background: Feedback is an essential tool for learning and improving performance in any sphere of education, including training of resident physicians. The learner's perception of the feedback they receive is extremely relevant to their learning progress, which must aim at providing qualified care for patients. Studies pertinent to the matter differ substantially with respect to methodology, population, context, and objective, which makes it even more difficult to achieve a clear understanding of the topic. A scoping review on this theme will unequivocally enhance and organize what is already known.

Objective: The aim of this study is to identify and map out data from studies that report surgical residents' perception of the feedback received during their education.

Methods: The review will consider studies on the feedback perception of resident physicians of any surgical specialty and age group, attending any year of residency, regardless of the type of feedback given and the way the perceptions were measured. Primary studies published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese since 2017 will be considered. The search will be carried out in 6 databases and reference lists will also be searched for additional studies. Duplicates will be removed, and 2 independent reviewers will screen the selected studies' titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data extraction will be performed through a tool developed by the researchers. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis (content analysis) will be used to analyze the data. A summary of the results will be presented in the form of diagrams, narratives, and tables.

Results: The findings of this scoping review were submitted to an indexed journal in July 2024, currently awaiting reviewer approval. The search was executed on March 15, 2024, and resulted in 588 articles. After the exclusion of the duplicate articles and those that did not meet the eligibility criteria as well as the inclusion of articles through a manual search, 13 articles were included in the review.

Conclusions: Conducting a scoping review is the best way to map what is known about a subject. By focusing on the feedback perception more than the feedback itself, the results of this study will surely contribute to gaining a deeper understanding of how to proceed to enhance internal feedback and surgical residents' learning progress.

Trial Registration: Open Science Framework yexb; https://osf.io/yexkb.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/56727.

References

Bello R, Sarmiento S, Meyer M, Rosson G, Cooney D, Lifchez S . Understanding Surgical Resident and Fellow Perspectives on Their Operative Performance Feedback Needs: A Qualitative Study. J Surg Educ. 2018; 75(6):1498-1503. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.002. View

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

Jug R, Jiang X, Bean S . Giving and Receiving Effective Feedback: A Review Article and How-To Guide. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018; 143(2):244-250. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0058-RA. View

Miles A, Ginsburg S, Sibbald M, Tavares W, Watling C, Stroud L . Feedback from health professionals in postgraduate medical education: Influence of interprofessional relationship, identity and power. Med Educ. 2020; 55(4):518-529. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14426. View

Molloy E, Ajjawi R, Bearman M, Noble C, Rudland J, Ryan A . Challenging feedback myths: Values, learner involvement and promoting effects beyond the immediate task. Med Educ. 2019; 54(1):33-39. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13802. View

Levac D, Colquhoun H, OBrien K . Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:69. PMC: 2954944. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. View

Ansari T, Usmani A . Students perception towards feedback in clinical sciences in an outcome-based integrated curriculum. Pak J Med Sci. 2018; 34(3):702-709. PMC: 6041542. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.343.15021. View

Gkiousias V . Scalpel Please! A Scoping Review Dissecting the Factors and Influences on Professional Identity Development of Trainees Within Surgical Programs. Cureus. 2022; 13(12):e20105. PMC: 8723698. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20105. View

Bing-You R, Hayes V, Varaklis K, Trowbridge R, Kemp H, McKelvy D . Feedback for Learners in Medical Education: What Is Known? A Scoping Review. Acad Med. 2017; 92(9):1346-1354. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001578. View

10.

Vu J, Harbaugh C, De Roo A, Biesterveld B, Gauger P, Dimick J . Leadership-Specific Feedback Practices in Surgical Residency: A Qualitative Study. J Surg Educ. 2019; 77(1):45-53. PMC: 6944744. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.08.020. View

11.

Peters M, Marnie C, Tricco A, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L . Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020; 18(10):2119-2126. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167. View

12.

Tomiak A, Braund H, Egan R, Dalgarno N, Emack J, Reid M . Exploring How the New Entrustable Professional Activity Assessment Tools Affect the Quality of Feedback Given to Medical Oncology Residents. J Cancer Educ. 2019; 35(1):165-177. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1456-z. View

13.

Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Khalil H, Larsen P, Marnie C . Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth. 2022; 20(4):953-968. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00242. View

14.

OFlynn E, Danial A, Gajewski J . Global Surgery Education and Training Programmes-a Scoping Review and Taxonomy. Indian J Surg. 2021; 84(Suppl 1):193-206. PMC: 8386150. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-021-03081-w. View

15.

Lees M, Zheng B, Daniels L, White J . Factors Affecting the Development of Confidence Among Surgical Trainees. J Surg Educ. 2018; 76(3):674-683. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.016. View

16.

Yama B, Hodgins M, Boydell K, Schwartz S . A qualitative exploration: questioning multisource feedback in residency education. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(1):170. PMC: 6057061. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1270-7. View

17.

Carr B, ONeil A, Lohse C, Heller S, Colletti J . Bridging the gap to effective feedback in residency training: perceptions of trainees and teachers. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(1):225. PMC: 6169074. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1333-9. View

18.

Nathwani J, Glarner C, Law K, McDonald R, Zelenski A, Greenberg J . Integrating Postoperative Feedback Into Workflow: Perceived Practices and Barriers. J Surg Educ. 2016; 74(3):406-414. PMC: 5485837. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.001. View

19.

El Boghdady M, Alijani A . Feedback in surgical education. Surgeon. 2016; 15(2):98-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.06.006. View

20.

Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, OBrien K, Colquhoun H, Levac D . PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7):467-473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850. View