» Articles » PMID: 39152044

Examining Intercage Transmission of : Impact of Barrier Husbandry and Cage Sanitization

Overview
Date 2024 Aug 16
PMID 39152044
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(Cm) has reemerged as a prevalent bacterial contaminant of academic research mouse colonies. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of husbandry and cage sanitization methods in preventing intercage transmission of Cm. To assess intercage transmission during cage change, a cage housing 2 Cm-free Swiss Webster (SW; Tac:SW) sentinel mice was placed randomly on each of 12 individually ventilated cage racks, housing cages with Cm-shedding mice, located in one of 2 animal holding rooms. Husbandry staff blinded to the study cages changed all cages in the animal holding rooms weekly using a microisolation cage technique. PCR testing performed at 180 d postplacement confirmed all mice remained negative for Cm. To assess the effectiveness of cage sanitization to eliminate Cm, we investigated transmission of Cm to a naive Cm-free SW and NOD.Cg- /SzJ (NSG) mouse cohoused for 7 d (repeated weekly for 4 wk) in cages assigned to one of 3 groups ( = 10 pairs of mice/group). Cages that previously housed 2 Cm-shedding BALB/c mice were either washed in a tunnel washer (82.2 °C [180 °F] final rinse for an average of 16 s per run; = 10) with and without postwashing autoclaving (121 °C for 20 min; = 10), or were untreated (bedding change only; = 10). Pre- and postsanitization swabs of each cage were assayed for Cm by PCR. All pretreatment swabs tested positive, while posttreatment swabs from all cages (excluding bedding change) tested negative. All SW and NSG mice, irrespective of group, remained negative for Cm as determined by PCR. These findings suggest that infectious Cm does not persist in untreated cages or after mechanical washing with and without autoclaving. Collectively, these findings suggest that neither our husbandry protocols nor inadequate cage sanitization methods likely contributed to the observed prevalence of Cm in contemporary research mouse colonies.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Antimicrobial Therapy in Eradicating Chlamydia muridarum in Research Mice: Immune Status and Its Impact on Outcomes.

Palillo M, Carrasco S, Mishkin N, Palillo J, Lynch D, Lawton S J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2025; 64(1):76-88.

PMID: 40035285 PMC: 11808367. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-069.


Causes Persistent Subclinical Infection and Elicits Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ and J:ARC(S) Mice Following Exposure to Shedding Mice.

Mishkin N, Carrasco S, Palillo M, Momtsios P, Woods C, Henderson K bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39071441 PMC: 11275779. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.16.603732.

References
1.
Elwell C, Mirrashidi K, Engel J . Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016; 14(6):385-400. PMC: 4886739. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.30. View

2.
. Abstracts of Scientific Presentations: 2022 AALAS National Meeting Louisville, Kentucky. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022; 61(5):506-589. PMC: 9536822. View

3.
Sachse K, Grossmann E, Berndt A, Schutt C, Henning K, Theegarten D . Respiratory chlamydial infection based on experimental aerosol challenge of pigs with Chlamydia suis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003; 27(1):7-23. DOI: 10.1016/S0147-9571(02)00079-6. View

4.
Compton S, Homberger F, Clark J . Microbiological monitoring in individually ventilated cage systems. Lab Anim (NY). 2004; 33(10):36-41. PMC: 7091582. DOI: 10.1038/laban1104-36. View

5.
Novak K, Kowalski R, Karenchak L, Gordon Y . Chlamydia trachomatis can be transmitted by a nonporous plastic surface in vitro. Cornea. 1995; 14(5):523-6. View