» Articles » PMID: 39147938

Profiling Cell-Free DNA from Malignant Pleural Effusion for Oncogenic Driver Mutations in Patients with Treatment-Naive Stage IV Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Overview
Journal Mol Diagn Ther
Date 2024 Aug 15
PMID 39147938
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of non-small-cell lung cancer specimens can identify oncogenic driver mutations and their corresponding targeted therapies. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping is easy to perform; however, false negatives cannot be overlooked. We explored malignant pleural effusion (MPE), a rich source of cfDNA, as a non-inferior alternative to tumor tissues for genotyping.

Methods: We conducted a prospective trial including 39 patients with newly diagnosed stage IV lung adenocarcinoma who presented with MPE. Tissue tests matching hotspot variants, including EGFR, ALK, and ROS1, were compared with the AlphaLiquid100 of PE-cfDNA.

Results: Among the 39 PE-cfDNA samples successfully sequenced, 32 (82.1%) had a PE cell-block tumor content of < 10%. Standard tissue or cell-block testing for EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 identified 20 mutations (51.3%), whereas PE cfDNA identified 25 mutations (64.1%). Five EGFR mutations were observed in PE cfDNA but not in Cobas EGFR owing to coverage or insufficient tumor content issues. The overall rate of oncogenic mutations identified in the PE cfDNA was 92.3%, and the mutation distribution was as follows: even with a very low cfDNA input, high detection rates could be achieved. Otherwise, most patients harbored co-mutations. Comparison of pleural fluid NGS with traditional testing revealed differences in accuracy. We also followed up with patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations who had a treatment response rate of 97.2% after 3 months.

Conclusions: Genotyping of MPE supernatant cfDNA is feasible in clinical practice, in addition to plasma and tumor testing, to improve diagnostic yield and extend patients' benefit from targeted therapies.

References
1.
Nicholson A, Tsao M, Beasley M, Borczuk A, Brambilla E, Cooper W . The 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Advances Since 2015. J Thorac Oncol. 2021; 17(3):362-387. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.11.003. View

2.
Heitzer E, Haque I, Roberts C, Speicher M . Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology. Nat Rev Genet. 2018; 20(2):71-88. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-018-0071-5. View

3.
Padinharayil H, Varghese J, John M, Rajanikant G, Wilson C, Al-Yozbaki M . Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): Implications on molecular pathology and advances in early diagnostics and therapeutics. Genes Dis. 2023; 10(3):960-989. PMC: 10308181. DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.07.023. View

4.
Xu T, Kang X, You X, Dai L, Tian D, Yan W . Cross-Platform Comparison of Four Leading Technologies for Detecting Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA from Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patient Plasma. Theranostics. 2017; 7(6):1437-1446. PMC: 5436504. DOI: 10.7150/thno.16558. View

5.
Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti M, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M . Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med. 2008; 14(9):985-90. PMC: 2820391. DOI: 10.1038/nm.1789. View