» Articles » PMID: 39146526

Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasonic Propulsion-Facilitated Clearance of Residual Kidney Stone Fragments Vs Observation

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigational procedure for awake patients. Our purpose was to evaluate whether ultrasonic propulsion to facilitate residual kidney stone fragment clearance reduced relapse.

Materials And Methods: This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial used single block randomization (1:1) without masking. Adults with residual fragments (individually ≤5 mm) were enrolled. Primary outcome was relapse as measured by stone growth, a stone-related urgent medical visit, or surgery by 5 years or study end. Secondary outcomes were fragment passage within 3 weeks and adverse events within 90 days. Cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare the treatment (ultrasonic propulsion) and control (observation) groups.

Results: The trial was conducted from May 9, 2015, through April 6, 2024. Median follow-up (interquartile range) was 3.0 (1.8-3.2) years. The treatment group (n = 40) had longer time to relapse than the control group (n = 42; < .003). The restricted mean time-to-relapse was 52% longer in the treatment group than in the control group (1530 ± 92 days vs 1009 ± 118 days), and the risk of relapse was lower (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.68) with 8 of 40 and 21 of 42 participants, respectively, experiencing relapse. Omitting 3 participants not asked about passage, 24 treatment (63%) and 2 control (5%) participants passed fragments within 3 weeks of treatment. adverse events were mild, transient, and self-resolving, and were reported in 25 treated participants (63%) and 17 controls (40%).

Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion reduced relapse and added minimal risk.

Clinical Trial Registration No.: NCT02028559.

References
1.
Pace K, Tariq N, Dyer S, Weir M, Honey R . Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2001; 166(6):2065-71. View

2.
Donaldson J, Lardas M, Scrimgeour D, Stewart F, MacLennan S, Lam T . Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol. 2014; 67(4):612-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054. View

3.
Chew B, Brotherhood H, Sur R, Wang A, Knudsen B, Yong C . Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium. J Urol. 2015; 195(4 Pt 1):982-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.009. View

4.
Odell P, Anderson K, DAgostino R . Maximum likelihood estimation for interval-censored data using a Weibull-based accelerated failure time model. Biometrics. 1992; 48(3):951-9. View

5.
Harper J, Lingeman J, Sweet R, Metzler I, Sunaryo P, Williams Jr J . Fragmentation of Stones by Burst Wave Lithotripsy in the First 19 Humans. J Urol. 2022; 207(5):1067-1076. PMC: 9078634. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002446. View