» Articles » PMID: 39145040

Ecological Phage Therapy: Can Bacteriophages Help Rapidly Restore the Soil Microbiome?

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2024 Aug 15
PMID 39145040
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Soil microbiota underpin ecosystem functionality yet are rarely targeted during ecosystem restoration. Soil microbiota recovery following native plant revegetation can take years to decades, while the effectiveness of soil inoculation treatments on microbiomes remains poorly explored. Therefore, innovative restoration treatments that target soil microbiota represent an opportunity to accelerate restoration outcomes. Here, we introduce the concept of ecological phage therapy-the application of phage for the targeted reduction of the most abundant and dominant bacterial taxa present in degraded ecosystems. We propose that naturally occurring bacteriophages-viruses that infect bacteria-could help rapidly shift soil microbiota towards target communities. Bacteriophages sculpt the microbiome by lysis of specific bacteria, and if followed by the addition of reference soil microbiota, such treatments could facilitate rapid reshaping of soil microbiota. Here, we experimentally tested this concept in a pilot study. We collected five replicate pre-treatment degraded soil samples, then three replicate soil samples 48 hours after phage, bacteria, and control treatments. Bacterial 16S rDNA sequencing showed that phage-treated soils had reduced bacterial diversity; however, when we combined ecological phage therapy with reference soil inoculation, we did not see a shift in soil bacterial community composition from degraded soil towards a reference-like community. Our pilot study provides early evidence that ecological phage therapy could help accelerate the reshaping of soil microbiota with the ultimate aim of reducing timeframes for ecosystem recovery. We recommend the next steps for ecological phage therapy be (a) developing appropriate risk assessment and management frameworks, and (b) focussing research effort on its practical application to maximise its accessibility to restoration practitioners.

Citing Articles

Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.

Timmis K, Karahan Z, Ramos J, Koren O, Perez-Cobas A, Steward K Microb Biotechnol. 2025; 18(1):e70068.

PMID: 39844583 PMC: 11754571. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.70068.

References
1.
van Elsas J, Chiurazzi M, Mallon C, Elhottova D, Kristufek V, Falcao Salles J . Microbial diversity determines the invasion of soil by a bacterial pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(4):1159-64. PMC: 3268289. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109326109. View

2.
Fernandes A, Reid J, Macklaim J, McMurrough T, Edgell D, Gloor G . Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis. Microbiome. 2014; 2:15. PMC: 4030730. DOI: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-15. View

3.
Liddicoat C, Sydnor H, Cando-Dumancela C, Dresken R, Liu J, Gellie N . Naturally-diverse airborne environmental microbial exposures modulate the gut microbiome and may provide anxiolytic benefits in mice. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 701:134684. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134684. View

4.
Steen A, Crits-Christoph A, Carini P, DeAngelis K, Fierer N, Lloyd K . High proportions of bacteria and archaea across most biomes remain uncultured. ISME J. 2019; 13(12):3126-3130. PMC: 6863901. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-019-0484-y. View

5.
Weinbauer M . Ecology of prokaryotic viruses. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004; 28(2):127-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001. View