» Articles » PMID: 39139426

Pulse Wave Velocity: Methodology, Clinical Applications, and Interplay with Heart Rate Variability

Overview
Date 2024 Aug 14
PMID 39139426
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pulse wave velocity (PWV) has been established as a promising biomarker in cardiovascular diagnostics, providing deep insights into vascular health and cardiovascular risk. Defined as the velocity at which the mechanical wave propagates along the arterial wall, PWV represents a useful surrogate marker for arterial vessel stiffness. PWV has garnered clinical attention, particularly in monitoring patients suffering from vascular diseases such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Its utility extends to preventive cardiology, aiding in identifying and stratifying cardiovascular risk. Despite the development of various measurement techniques, direct or indirect tonometry, Doppler ultrasound, oscillometric analysis, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), methodological variability and lack of standardization lead to inconsistencies in PWV assessment. In addition, PWV can be estimated through surrogate parameters, such as pulse arrival or pulse transit times, although this heterogeneity limits standardization and, therefore, its clinical use. Furthermore, confounding factors, such as variations in sympathetic tone, strongly influence PWV readings, thereby necessitating careful control during assessments. The bidirectional relationship between heart rate variability (HRV) and PWV underscores the interplay between cardiac autonomic function and vascular health, suggesting that alterations in one could directly influence the other. Future research should prioritize the standardization and increase comparability of PWV measurement techniques and explore the complex physiological variables influencing PWV. Integrating multiple physiological parameters such as PWV and HRV into algorithms based on artificial intelligence holds immense promise for advancing personalized vascular health assessments and cardiovascular care.

Citing Articles

Phonocardiography based pulse wave velocity system for non-occlusive assessment of arterial stiffness.

Margain T, Powell E, Clark A, Bush A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1481836.

PMID: 39916691 PMC: 11798789. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1481836.


Machine learning-based blood pressure estimation using impedance cardiography data.

Bothe T, Patzak A, Opatz O, Heinz V, Pilz N Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2025; 241(2):e14269.

PMID: 39803779 PMC: 11726408. DOI: 10.1111/apha.14269.


Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Determined with Oscillometric Pulse Wave Analysis Algorithm Antares Is an Independent Predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Dorr M, Lapp H, Richter S, Stauber A, Bahls M, Gross S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685495 PMC: 11642281. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237035.

References
1.
Pilz N, Patzak A, Bothe T . Continuous cuffless and non-invasive measurement of arterial blood pressure-concepts and future perspectives. Blood Press. 2022; 31(1):254-269. DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2022.2128716. View

2.
Sutton-Tyrrell K, Mackey R, Holubkov R, Vaitkevicius P, Spurgeon H, Lakatta E . Measurement variation of aortic pulse wave velocity in the elderly. Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14(5 Pt 1):463-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(00)01289-9. View

3.
Bothe T, Hulpke-Wette M, Barbarics B, Patzak A, Pilz N . Accuracy of cuff-less, continuous, and non-invasive blood pressure measurement in 24-h ABPM in children aged 5-17. Blood Press. 2023; 32(1):2255704. DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2023.2255704. View

4.
Ueda I, Tagawa T, Watanabe S, Yamakawa K, Yasu T, Ueda S . Comparability and reproducibility of the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurements using a multi-element carotid tonometry sensor. J Hum Hypertens. 2008; 22(10):699-703. DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2008.57. View

5.
van Montfrans G . Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: progress and problems. Blood Press Monit. 2002; 6(6):287-90. DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200112000-00004. View