» Articles » PMID: 39136011

Efficacy and Safety of a Proposed Omalizumab Biosimilar Compared to the Reference Product in the Management of Uncontrolled Moderate-to-severe Allergic Asthma: a Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Equivalency Clinical Trial

Abstract

Background And Aims: Allergic asthma has a considerable burden on the quality of life. A significant portion of moderate-to-severe allergic asthma patients need omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin-E monoclonal antibody, as an add-on therapy. In this phase III clinical trial P043 (Zerafil, CinnaGen, Iran) efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were compared with Xolair (the originator omalizumab). The primary outcome was the rate of protocol-defined asthma exacerbations.

Methods: Exacerbation rates, Asthma Control Test (ACT) results, spirometry measurements, immunogenicity, and safety were evaluated. Each subject received either medication with a dose ranging from 150 to 375 mg based on pre-treatment serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg) every two or four weeks for a duration of 28 weeks.

Results: Exacerbation rates were 0.150 (CI: 0.079-0.220) in the P043 group, and 0.190 (CI: 0.110-0.270) in the omalizumab group (per-protocol). The least squares mean differences of predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in the First second (FEV) were -2.51% (CI: -7.17-2.15, P=0.29) and -3.87% (CI: -8.79-1.04, P=0.12), pre- and post-bronchodilator use. The mean ± SD of ACT scores at the screening and the last visit were 10.62 ± 2.93 and 20.93 ± 4.26 in P043 and 11.09 ± 2.75 and 20.46 ± 5.11 in the omalizumab group. A total of 288 adverse events were reported for the 256 enrolled participants. Among all, "dyspnea" and "headache" were the most reported ones. The overall incidence of adverse events (P=0.62) and serious adverse events (P=0.07) had no significant differences between the two groups. None of the samples were positive for anti-drug antibodies.

Conclusion: P043 was equivalent to omalizumab in the management of asthma in reduction of exacerbations. There was no significant difference in other efficacy and safety parameters.

Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05813470) and www.IRCT.ir (IRCT20150303021315N20).

References
1.
Casale T, Luskin A, Busse W, Zeiger R, Trzaskoma B, Yang M . Omalizumab Effectiveness by Biomarker Status in Patients with Asthma: Evidence From PROSPERO, A Prospective Real-World Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018; 7(1):156-164.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.04.043. View

2.
Sadatsafavi M, Lynd L, Marra C, Carleton B, Tan W, Sullivan S . Direct health care costs associated with asthma in British Columbia. Can Respir J. 2010; 17(2):74-80. PMC: 2866215. DOI: 10.1155/2010/361071. View

3.
Yalcin A, Celik B, Yalcin A . Omalizumab (anti-IgE) therapy in the asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) and its effects on circulating cytokine levels. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2016; 38(3):253-6. DOI: 10.3109/08923973.2016.1173057. View

4.
Busse W, Massanari M, Kianifard F, Geba G . Effect of omalizumab on the need for rescue systemic corticosteroid treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent IgE-mediated allergic asthma: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007; 23(10):2379-86. DOI: 10.1185/030079907X226258. View

5.
Yalcin A, Uzun R . Anti-IgE Significantly Changes Circulating Interleukin-25, Vitamin-D and Interleukin-33 Levels in Patients with Allergic Asthma. Curr Pharm Des. 2019; 25(35):3784-3795. DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666190930095725. View