» Articles » PMID: 39134429

Establishment and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Patients with Metastatic Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Cancer Control
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Aug 12
PMID 39134429
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Metastatic pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is an aggressive cancer with generally poor outcomes. Effective methods for predicting survival in patients with metastatic LCNEC are needed. This study aimed to identify independent survival predictors and develop nomograms for predicting survival in patients with metastatic LCNEC.

Patients And Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, identifying patients with metastatic LCNEC diagnosed between 2010 and 2017. To find independent predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS), we performed Cox regression analysis. A nomogram was developed to predict the 6-, 12-, and 18-month CSS rates of patients with metastatic LCNEC. The concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC), and calibration curves were adopted with the aim of assessing whether the model can be discriminative and reliable. Decision curve analyses (DCAs) were used to assess the model's utility and benefits from a clinical perspective.

Results: This study enrolled a total of 616 patients, of whom 432 were allocated to the training cohort and 184 to the validation cohort. Age, T staging, N staging, metastatic sites, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for patients with metastatic LCNEC based on multivariable Cox regression analysis results. The nomogram showed strong performance with C-index values of 0.733 and 0.728 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. ROC curves indicated good predictive performance of the model, with AUC values of 0.796, 0.735, and 0.736 for predicting the 6-, 12-, and 18-month CSS rates of patients with metastatic LCNEC in the training cohort, and 0.795, 0.801, and 0.780 in the validation cohort, respectively. Calibration curves and DCAs confirmed the nomogram's reliability and clinical utility.

Conclusion: The new nomogram was developed for predicting CSS in patients with metastatic LCNEC, providing personalized risk evaluation and aiding clinical decision-making.

References
1.
Shan Q, Fan Y, Guo J, Han X, Wang H, Wang Z . Relationship between tumor size and metastatic site in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: A large SEER-based study. PeerJ. 2019; 7:e7822. PMC: 6790223. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7822. View

2.
Park S, Park J, Kim H, Park S . Review of Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Survival or Other Time-to-Event Prediction Models (from Conventional to Deep Learning Approaches). Korean J Radiol. 2021; 22(10):1697-1707. PMC: 8484151. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0223. View

3.
Miyoshi T, Umemura S, Matsumura Y, Mimaki S, Tada S, Makinoshima H . Genomic Profiling of Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 23(3):757-765. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0355. View

4.
Jiang T, Sun H, Li N, Jiang T . Metastasis pattern and prognosis of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a population-based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(15):13511-13521. PMC: 10590330. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04975-w. View

5.
Kinslow C, May M, Saqi A, Shu C, Chaudhary K, Wang T . Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Population-Based Study. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019; 21(2):e99-e113. DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.07.011. View