» Articles » PMID: 39133324

Prognostic Significance of Residual Tumor at Restaging Transurethral Bladder Resection in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Abstract

Purpose: To assess prognostic significance of residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in contemporary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients.

Methods: Patients were identified retrospectively from eight referral centers in France, Italy and Spain. The cohort included consecutive patients with high or very-high risk NMIBC who underwent reTUR and subsequent adjuvant BCG therapy.

Results: A total of 440 high-risk NMIBC patients were screened, 29 (6%) were upstaged ≥ T2 at reTUR and 411 were analyzed (T1 stage: n = 275, 67%). Residual tumor was found in 191 cases (46%). In patients with T1 tumor on initial TURBT, persistent T1 tumor was found in 18% of reTUR (n = 49/275). In patients with high-grade Ta tumor on initial TURBT, T1 tumor was found in 6% of reTUR (n = 9/136). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, we found no statistical association between the use of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD, p = 0.4) or type of resection (conventional vs. en bloc, p = 0.6) and the risk of residual tumor. The estimated 5-yr recurrence and progression-free survival were 56% and 94%, respectively. Residual tumor was significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence (p < 0.001) but not progression (p = 0.11). Only residual T1 tumor was associated with a higher risk of progression (p < 0.001) with an estimated 5-yr progression-free survival rate of 76%.

Conclusions: ReTUR should remain a standard for T1 tumors, irrespective of the use of en bloc resection or PDD and could be safely omitted in high-grade Ta tumors. Persistent T1 tumor at reTUR should not exclude these patients from conservative management, and further studies are needed to explore the benefit of a third resection in this subgroup.

References
1.
Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat E, Dominguez Escrig J . European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol. 2021; 81(1):75-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010. View

2.
Ramirez-Backhaus M, Dominguez-Escrig J, Collado A, Rubio-Briones J, Solsona E . Restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor for high-risk stage Ta and T1 bladder cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2012; 13(2):109-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-012-0234-4. View

3.
Naselli A, Hurle R, Paparella S, Buffi N, Lughezzani G, Lista G . Role of Restaging Transurethral Resection for T1 Non-muscle invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2017; 4(4):558-567. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.12.011. View

4.
Gregg J, Mccormick B, Wang L, Cohen P, Sun D, Penson D . Short term complications from transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Can J Urol. 2016; 23(2):8198-203. View

5.
Mori K, Miura N, Babjuk M, Karakiewicz P, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E . Low compliance to guidelines in nonmuscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: A systematic review. Urol Oncol. 2020; 38(10):774-782. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.013. View