A Meta-analysis of Standard Versus Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Overview

Journal J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv

Specialty Cardiology & Vascular Diseases

Date 2024 Aug 12

PMID 39132529

Authors

Elizabeth S Bruno

Mark Terence P Mujer

Parth V Desai

Yevgeniy Brailovsky

Amir Darki

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (SCDT) harnesses the therapeutic benefit of systemic thrombolytics while minimizing bleeding complications in patients presenting with pulmonary embolism (PE). Ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) theoretically improves upon SCDT by disrupting fibrin and increasing the surface area exposed to thrombolytic agent. However, it is unclear if this translates into improved outcomes.

Methods: A systematic search of prior publications comparing SCDT and USAT in patients with intermediate or high-risk PE was conducted. Primary outcomes of interest were bleeding events, ICU and hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes included changes in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), and right ventricle to left ventricle diameter (RV/LV) ratio. Studies that lacked comparison groups were excluded. Bias assessments were performed using the Cochrane tools for randomized and nonrandomized studies. Data was collated utilizing the Cochrane Review Manager software, and all analyses assumed random effects.

Results: Our search yielded 7 observational studies and 1 randomized control trial. The studies included a total of 543 patients who underwent either SCDT (n = 273) or USAT (n = 270) for intermediate or high-risk PE. The synthesized analysis showed no significant differences in bleeding between the groups. There were no differences in ICU or hospital lengths of stay, changes in PASP, or mPAP. Reductions in RV/LV ratio were greater with SCDT (mean difference, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.27 to -0.06; = .003).

Conclusions: In comparison to SCDT, USAT did not result in improved clinical or hemodynamic outcomes in patients presenting with PE. Results were limited by heterogeneity among the included studies.

References

Allen S, Chan L, Masic D, Porcaro K, Morris S, Haines J . Comparison of outcomes in catheter-directed versus ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for management of submassive pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2021; 202:96-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.03.009. View

Graif A, Grilli C, Kimbiris G, Agriantonis D, Chohan O, Fedele C . Comparison of Ultrasound-Accelerated versus Pigtail Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28(10):1339-1347. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.07.004. View

Rothschild D, Goldstein J, Ciacci J, Bowers T . Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) versus standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for treatment of pulmonary embolism: A retrospective analysis. Vasc Med. 2019; 24(3):234-240. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X19838350. View

Piazza G, Hohlfelder B, Jaff M, Ouriel K, Engelhardt T, Sterling K . A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Trial of Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed, Low-Dose Fibrinolysis for Acute Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: The SEATTLE II Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(10):1382-1392. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.020. View

Avgerinos E, Jaber W, Lacomis J, Markel K, McDaniel M, Rivera-Lebron B . Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Versus Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: The SUNSET sPE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14(12):1364-1373. PMC: 9057455. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.049. View

Liang N, Avgerinos E, Marone L, Singh M, Makaroun M, Chaer R . Comparative Outcomes of Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis and Standard Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016; 50(6):405-10. PMC: 7193277. DOI: 10.1177/1538574416666228. View

Rao G, Xu H, Wang J, Galmer A, Giri J, Jaff M . Ultrasound-assisted versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism: A multicenter comparison of patient-centered outcomes. Vasc Med. 2019; 24(3):241-247. DOI: 10.1177/1358863X19838334. View

de Lourdes Garcia M , Valencia , Pierzo , Rosas . Streptokinase and Heparin versus Heparin Alone in Massive Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1995; 2(3):227-229. DOI: 10.1007/BF01062714. View

Kuo W, Banerjee A, Kim P, DeMarco Jr F, Levy J, Facchini F . Pulmonary Embolism Response to Fragmentation, Embolectomy, and Catheter Thrombolysis (PERFECT): Initial Results From a Prospective Multicenter Registry. Chest. 2015; 148(3):667-673. DOI: 10.1378/chest.15-0119. View

10.

Lin P, Annambhotla S, Bechara C, Athamneh H, Weakley S, Kobayashi K . Comparison of percutaneous ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis versus catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with acute massive pulmonary embolism. Vascular. 2009; 17 Suppl 3:S137-47. DOI: 10.2310/6670.2009.00063. View

11.

Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, Agnelli G, Becattini C, Beyer-Westendorf J . Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(15):1402-11. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302097. View

12.

Beyer S, Shanafelt C, Pinto D, Weinstein J, Aronow H, Weinberg I . Utilization and Outcomes of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Chest. 2019; 157(3):645-653. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.049. View

13.

Francis C, Suchkova V . Ultrasound and thrombolysis. Vasc Med. 2002; 6(3):181-7. DOI: 10.1177/1358836x0100600309. View

14.

Huang W, Goldberg R, Anderson F, Kiefe C, Spencer F . Secular trends in occurrence of acute venous thromboembolism: the Worcester VTE study (1985-2009). Am J Med. 2014; 127(9):829-39.e5. PMC: 4161646. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.03.041. View

15.

Owens C . Ultrasound-Enhanced Thrombolysis: EKOS EndoWave Infusion Catheter System. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2011; 25(1):37-41. PMC: 3036401. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1052304. View