» Articles » PMID: 39132254

Bioengineering-tissue Strategies to Model Mammalian Implantation

Overview
Date 2024 Aug 12
PMID 39132254
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During mammalian implantation, complex and well-orchestrated interactions between the trophectoderm of implanting blastocysts and the maternal endometrium lead to a successful pregnancy. On the other hand, alteration in endometrium-blastocyst crosstalk often causes implantation failure, pregnancy loss, and complications that result in overall infertility. In domestic animals, this represents one of the major causes of economic losses and the understanding of the processes taking place during the early phases of implantation, in both healthy and pathological conditions, is of great importance, to enhance livestock system efficiency. Here we develop highly predictive and reproducible functional tridimensional (3D) models able to mimic the two main actors that play a key role at this developmental stage: the blastocyst and the endometrium. In particular, we generate a 3D endometrial model by co-culturing primary epithelial and stromal cells, isolated from sow uteri, onto highly porous polystyrene scaffolds. In parallel, we chemically reprogram porcine adult dermal fibroblasts and encapsulate them into micro-bioreactors to create trophoblast (TR) spheroids. Finally, we combine the generated artificial endometrium with the TR spheroids to model mammalian implantation and mimic the embryo-maternal interactions. The protocols here described allow the generation of reproducible and functional 3D models of both the maternal compartment as well as the implanting embryo, able to recreate the architecture and physiology of the two tissues . We suggest that these models can find useful applications to further elucidate early implantation mechanisms and to study the complex interactions between the maternal tissue and the developing embryos.

References
1.
Zhang S, Lin H, Kong S, Wang S, Wang H, Wang H . Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation. Mol Aspects Med. 2013; 34(5):939-80. PMC: 4278353. DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.011. View

2.
Yabe S, Alexenko A, Amita M, Yang Y, Schust D, Sadovsky Y . Comparison of syncytiotrophoblast generated from human embryonic stem cells and from term placentas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(19):E2598-607. PMC: 4868474. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1601630113. View

3.
Peltoniemi O, Bjorkman S, Oropeza-Moe M, Oliviero C . Developments of reproductive management and biotechnology in the pig. Anim Reprod. 2020; 16(3):524-538. PMC: 7234181. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0055. View

4.
Arcuri S, Gandolfi F, Somigliana E, Brevini T . A Two-Step Protocol to Erase Human Skin Fibroblasts and Convert Them into Trophoblast-like Cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2021; 2273:151-158. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1246-0_10. View

5.
Einspanier A, Lieder K, Bruns A, Husen B, Thole H, Simon C . Induction of endometriosis in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). Mol Hum Reprod. 2006; 12(5):291-9. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gal031. View