» Articles » PMID: 39131874

Factors Influencing Patient Decision-Making in the Treatment of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Overview
Journal Bladder Cancer
Publisher IOS Press
Date 2024 Aug 12
PMID 39131874
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In 2023, an estimated 82,290 individuals were diagnosed with bladder cancer in the United States. For muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the American Urological Association recommends offering radical cystectomy with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, patients are increasingly requesting alternative treatments.

Objective: To describe factors influencing selection of radical cystectomy with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC + RC), radical cystectomy monotherapy (RC), or tri-modality therapy (TMT) among patients with MIBC.

Methods: Individual, semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with 18 adults who underwent MIBC treatment at the University of North Carolina, recruiting six patients each from three treatment groups: 1) NAC + RC, 2) RC, and 3) TMT. Interview transcriptions were qualitatively analyzed using QSR NVivo, with major themes and sub-themes extracted. Patients also completed the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9; range 0-100).

Results: Concern for survival and risks, quality of life, and varied patient preferences for involvement influenced the decision-making process. Concern surrounding sexual function, bladder preservation, and urostomy bags drove patients towards TMT. High levels of shared decision-making were observed overall, with a median SDM-Q-9 score of 95 (IQR 89-100). Patients undergoing TMT reported the highest median SDM-Q-9 score (97, IQR 94-100), while those receiving radical cystectomy alone had the lowest (66, IQR 37-96).

Conclusions: Patients with MIBC described a multifaceted treatment decision-making process, highlighting key influences, concerns, and unmet needs. Understanding this process can help address misconceptions and align treatment choices with patient goals. Physicians can use these insights to engage in shared decision-making, ultimately improving patient experiences and outcomes.

References
1.
Budenbender B, Kother A, Kriegmair M, Grune B, Michel M, Alpers G . Getting specific: participation preference in urooncological decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023; 23(1):114. PMC: 10324222. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02201-8. View

2.
Chapple A, Ziebland S, Herxheimer A, McPherson A, Shepperd S, Miller R . Is 'watchful waiting' a real choice for men with prostate cancer? A qualitative study. BJU Int. 2002; 90(3):257-64. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02846.x. View

3.
Zlotta A, Ballas L, Niemierko A, Lajkosz K, Kuk C, Miranda G . Radical cystectomy versus trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-institutional propensity score matched and weighted analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2023; 24(6):669-681. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00170-5. View

4.
Verghote F, Van Praet C, Berquin C, Lumen N, Decaestecker K, Vanneste B . Radical cystectomy or trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a qualitative study exploring patient priorities and counselling needs when making a treatment choice. BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):160. PMC: 10832089. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11927-1. View

5.
Costin M, Makaroff L . Bladder Preservation With Radiotherapy: The Patient Perspective. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021; 33(6):346-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.03.015. View