» Articles » PMID: 39131188

Evaluation of Potential Breast Cancer Receptor Antagonists from GC-MS and HPLC Identified Compounds in Extracts

Overview
Journal RSC Adv
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2024 Aug 12
PMID 39131188
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Pharmacotherapeutic targets for breast cancer include the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Inhibitors of these receptors could be interesting therapeutic candidates for the treatment and management of breast cancer (BC). : This study used GC-MS and HPLC to identify bioactive compounds in () extracts and applied methods to identify potent EGFR, ER, and PR inhibitors from the compounds as potential drug candidates. : GC-MS and HPLC were used to identify bioactive chemicals in extracts of aqueous (PO-A), methanol (PO-M), ethanol (PO-E), chloroform (PO-C), and -hexane (PO-H). The ER, PR, and EGFR model optimization and molecular docking of compounds/control inhibitors in the binding pocket were simulated using AutoDock Vina in PyRx. The drug-likeness, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic features of prospective docking leads were all anticipated. : The results indicated the existence of 29 compounds in PO-A, 36 compounds in PO-M and PO-E, 42 compounds in PO-C, and 22 compounds in PO-H extracts. With ER, only -tolylamino-acetic acid (4-nitro-benzylidene)-hydrazide (-7.5 kcal mol) from the ethanolic extract could bind to the receptor. PR and EGFR, on the other hand, identified several compounds with higher binding affinities than the control. Ergotaman-3',6',18-trione (-8.1 kcal mol), 5,10-diethoxy-2,3,7,8-tetrahydro-1,6-dipyrrolo[1,2-:1',2'-]pyrazine (-7.8 kcal mol) from the aqueous extract; -tolylamino-acetic acid (4-nitro-benzylidene)-hydrazide (-8.4 kcal mol) from the ethanolic extract had better binding affinity compared to progesterone (-7.7 kcal mol). Likewise, ergotaman-3',6',18-trione (-9.7 kcal mol) from the aqueous extract and phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethyl ethyl) (-8.2 kcal mol) from the chloroform extract had better binding affinities compared to the control, gefitinib (-7.9 kcal mol) with regards to EGFR. None of the PO-H or PO-M extracts outperformed the control for any of the proteins. Phenols and flavonoids such as quercetin, luteolin, rutin, chrysin, apigenin, ellagic acid, and naringenin had better binding affinity to PR and EGFR compared to their control. : The identified compounds in the class of phenols and flavonoids were better lead molecules due to their ability to strongly bind to the proteins' receptors. These compounds showed promising drug-like properties; they could be safe and new leads for creating anticancer medicines.

Citing Articles

Molecular Docking Appraisal of Phytochemicals as Potential Inhibitors of PI3K/Akt Pathway for Breast Cancer Treatment.

Effiong M, Bella-Omunagbe M, Afolabi I, Chinedu S Bioinform Biol Insights. 2025; 19:11779322251316864.

PMID: 39906062 PMC: 11792010. DOI: 10.1177/11779322251316864.


Mechanistic Insights into the Anticancer Potential of Methoxyflavones Analogs: A Review.

Aidiel M, Abdul Mutalib M, Ramasamy R, Nik Ramli N, Tang S, Adam S Molecules. 2025; 30(2).

PMID: 39860214 PMC: 11768088. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30020346.

References
1.
Rosendahl A, Perks C, Zeng L, Markkula A, Simonsson M, Rose C . Caffeine and Caffeic Acid Inhibit Growth and Modify Estrogen Receptor and Insulin-like Growth Factor I Receptor Levels in Human Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21(8):1877-87. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1748. View

2.
Macharia J, Zhang L, Mwangi R, Rozmann N, Kaposztas Z, Varjas T . Are chemical compounds in medical mushrooms potent against colorectal cancer carcinogenesis and antimicrobial growth?. Cancer Cell Int. 2022; 22(1):379. PMC: 9714114. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-022-02798-2. View

3.
Meeran M, Seenipandi A, Javed H, Sharma C, Hashiesh H, Goyal S . Can limonene be a possible candidate for evaluation as an agent or adjuvant against infection, immunity, and inflammation in COVID-19?. Heliyon. 2021; 7(1):e05703. PMC: 7810623. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05703. View

4.
Ganesh B, Raj A, Aruchamy B, Nanjan P, Drago C, Ramani P . Pyrrole: A Decisive Scaffold for the Development of Therapeutic Agents and Structure-Activity Relationship. ChemMedChem. 2023; 19(1):e202300447. DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.202300447. View

5.
Lehtonen M, Kekalainen S, Nikkila I, Kilpelainen P, Tenkanen M, Mikkonen K . Active food packaging through controlled production and release of hexanal. Food Chem X. 2020; 5:100074. PMC: 6928337. DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2019.100074. View