» Articles » PMID: 39130140

Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: 1-Year Results From the Disrupt CAD III Study

Abstract

Background: Coronary calcification impairs stent delivery and optimal expansion, a significant predictor of subsequent stent thrombosis and restenosis. Current calcium ablative technologies may be limited by guidewire bias and periprocedural complications. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) delivers acoustic pressure waves to modify calcium, enhance vessel compliance, and optimize stent deployment. The Disrupt CAD III study demonstrated high (92.4%) procedural success and low (7.8%) 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates following IVL, but longer term follow-up is required to determine the durability of clinical benefit and the late impact of optimized stent implantation associated with IVL. This analysis evaluates 1-year outcomes from the Disrupt CAD III study.

Methods: Disrupt CAD III (NCT03595176) was a prospective, single-arm approval study designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of IVL as an adjunct to coronary stenting in , severely calcified coronary lesions ( = 384). MACE was defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization; target lesion failure was defined as cardiac death, MI, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR).

Results: At 1 year, MACE occurred in 13.8% of patients (cardiac death: 1.1%, MI: 10.5%, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization: 6.0%) and target lesion failure occurred in 11.9% (ID-TLR: 4.3%), both driven by non-Q-wave MI (9.2%). Stent thrombosis (definite or probable) occurred in 1.1% of patients (including 1 event [0.3%] beyond 30 ​days).

Conclusions: Disrupt CAD III represents the largest long-term (1-year) analysis of coronary IVL to date. IVL treatment prior to coronary stent implantation in severely calcified lesions was associated with low 1-year rates of MACE, ID-TLR, and stent thrombosis.

Citing Articles

Equity in Modifying Plaque of Women With Undertreated Calcified Coronary Artery Disease: Design and Rationale of EMPOWER CAD study.

McEntegart M, Gonzalo N, Fendelander L, West N, Lansky A J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(11):102289.

PMID: 39649816 PMC: 11624350. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102289.


Dedicated Balloon Techniques for Coronary Calcium Modification.

Maffey M, Bagur R Interv Cardiol. 2024; 19:e13.

PMID: 39221062 PMC: 11363055. DOI: 10.15420/icr.2024.06.


Impact of coronary calcium morphology on intravascular lithotripsy.

McInerney A, Travieso A, Jeronimo Baza A, Alfonso F, Del Val D, Cerrato E EuroIntervention. 2024; 20(10):e656-e668.

PMID: 38776142 PMC: 11100505. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00605.


Intravascular Lithotripsy for Vessel Preparation in Calcified Coronary Arteries Prior to Stent Placement - Japanese Disrupt CAD IV Study 2-Year Results.

Saito S, Yamazaki S, Takahashi A, Namiki A, Kawasaki T, Otsuji S Circ Rep. 2023; 5(12):437-441.

PMID: 38073870 PMC: 10700032. DOI: 10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0082.


Rotational Atherectomy, Orbital Atherectomy, and Intravascular Lithotripsy Comparison for Calcified Coronary Lesions.

Florek K, Bartoszewska E, Biegala S, Klimek O, Malcharczyk B, Kubler P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068298 PMC: 10707420. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237246.


References
1.
Beohar N, Kaltenbach L, Wojdyla D, Pineda A, Rao S, Stone G . Trends in Usage and Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Atherectomy: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13(2):e008239. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008239. View

2.
Ali Z, McEntegart M, Hill J, Spratt J . Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of stent underexpansion secondary to severe coronary calcification. Eur Heart J. 2018; 41(3):485-486. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy747. View

3.
Di Mario C, Koskinas K, Raber L . Clinical Benefit of IVUS Guidance for Coronary Stenting: The ULTIMATE Step Toward Definitive Evidence?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(24):3138-3141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.029. View

4.
Riley R, Henry T, Mahmud E, Kirtane A, Brilakis E, Goyal A . SCAI position statement on optimal percutaneous coronary interventional therapy for complex coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 96(2):346-362. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28994. View

5.
Kinnaird T, Gallagher S, Sharp A, Protty M, Salim T, Ludman P . Operator Volumes and In-Hospital Outcomes: An Analysis of 7,740 Rotational Atherectomy Procedures From the BCIS National Database. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14(13):1423-1430. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.034. View