Alpha 2.0
Login Register
» Articles » PMID: 39127639

Age- and Deprivation-related Inequalities in Identification of People at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in England

Overview
Journal BMC Public Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Aug 10
PMID 39127639
Authors
Ruth Watkinson
Emma McManus
Rachel Meacock
Matt Sutton
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Early detection of intermediate hyperglycaemia, otherwise known as non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH) is crucial to identify people at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who could benefit from preventative interventions. Failure to identify NDH may also increase the risks of T2DM-related complications at the time of T2DM diagnosis. We investigate sociodemographic inequalities in identification of NDH in England.

Methods: We used nationwide data from the English National Health Service (NHS) National Diabetes Audit, which includes all people who were newly identified with NDH (N = 469,910) or diagnosed with T2DM (N = 222,795) between 1st April 2019 and 31st March 2020. We used regression models to explore inequalities in the under identification of NDH by area-level deprivation and age group.

Results: Of those with a new T2DM diagnosis, 67.3% had no previous record of NDH. The odds of no previous NDH being recorded were higher amongst people living in more deprived areas (Odds ratio (OR) 1.15 (95% confidence intervals (CI) [1.12, 1.19]) most deprived (Q1) compared to least deprived (Q5) quintile) and younger individuals (OR 4.02 (95% CI [3.79, 4.27] under 35s compared to age 75-84)). Deprivation-related inequalities persisted after stratification by age group, with the largest inequalities amongst middle and older age groups. People living in more deprived areas and younger people also had shorter recorded NDH duration before progression to T2DM, and higher T2DM severity at the time of diagnosis.

Conclusions: There is under identification of NDH relative to diagnosis of T2DM amongst people living in more deprived areas and particularly amongst younger people, resulting in missed opportunities for targeted T2DM prevention efforts and potentially contributing to inequalities in T2DM prevalence and severity. More active NDH case-finding amongst these groups may be an important first step in helping to reduce inequalities in T2DM.

References
1.
Howarth E, Bower P, Kontopantelis E, Soiland-Reyes C, Meacock R, Whittaker W . 'Going the distance': an independent cohort study of engagement and dropout among the first 100 000 referrals into a large-scale diabetes prevention program. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020; 8(2). PMC: 7733095. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001835. View
2.
Moody A, Cowley G, Ng Fat L, Mindell J . Social inequalities in prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in participants in the Health Surveys for England series. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(2):e010155. PMC: 4746474. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010155. View
3.
Ravindrarajah R, Sutton M, Reeves D, Cotterill S, McManus E, Meacock R . Referral to the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme and conversion from nondiabetic hyperglycaemia to type 2 diabetes mellitus in England: A matched cohort analysis. PLoS Med. 2023; 20(2):e1004177. PMC: 9970065. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004177. View
4.
Valabhji J, Barron E, Bradley D, Bakhai C, Fagg J, ONeill S . Early Outcomes From the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme. Diabetes Care. 2019; 43(1):152-160. PMC: 7115827. DOI: 10.2337/dc19-1425. View
5.
Nussbaum C, Massou E, Fisher R, Morciano M, Harmer R, Ford J . Inequalities in the distribution of the general practice workforce in England: a practice-level longitudinal analysis. BJGP Open. 2021; 5(5). PMC: 8596307. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0066. View