» Articles » PMID: 39125646

High-Throughput Determination of Infectious Virus Titers by Kinetic Measurement of Infection-Induced Changes in Cell Morphology

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Aug 10
PMID 39125646
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Infectivity assays are the key analytical technology for the development and manufacturing of virus-based therapeutics. Here, we introduce a novel assay format that utilizes label-free bright-field images to determine the kinetics of infection-dependent changes in cell morphology. In particular, cell rounding is directly proportional to the amount of infectious virus applied, enabling rapid determination of viral titers in relation to a standard curve. Our kinetic infectious virus titer (KIT) assay is stability-indicating and, due to its sensitive readout method, provides results within 24 h post-infection. Compared to traditional infectivity assays, which depend on a single readout of an infection endpoint, cumulated analysis of kinetic data by a fit model results in precise results (CV < 20%) based on only three wells per sample. This approach allows for a high throughput with ~400 samples processed by a single operator per week. We demonstrate the applicability of the KIT assay for the genetically engineered oncolytic VSV-GP, Newcastle disease virus (NDV), and parapoxvirus ovis (ORFV), but it can potentially be extended to a wide range of viruses that induce morphological changes upon infection. The versatility of this assay, combined with its independence from specific instruments or software, makes it a promising solution to overcome the analytical bottleneck in infectivity assays within the pharmaceutical industry and as a routine method in academic research.

Citing Articles

Navigating Uncertainties in RT-qPCR and Infectivity Assessment of Norovirus.

Mirmahdi R, Dicker S, Yusuf N, Montazeri N Food Environ Virol. 2025; 17(1):22.

PMID: 40057626 PMC: 11890344. DOI: 10.1007/s12560-024-09632-0.

References
1.
Anam S, Rahman S, Ali S, Saeed M, Goyal S . Comparative growth kinetic study of Newcastle disease virus, infectious bursal disease virus and avian influenza virus in chicken embryo fibroblast and DF-1 cell lines. Pol J Vet Sci. 2021; 24(2):287-292. DOI: 10.24425/pjvs.2021.137664. View

2.
Zapata-Cardona M, Florez-Alvarez L, Gomez-Gallego D, Moncada-Diaz M, Hernandez J, Diaz F . Comparison among plaque assay, tissue culture infectious dose (TCID) and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 variants quantification. Iran J Microbiol. 2023; 14(3):291-299. PMC: 10132340. DOI: 10.18502/ijm.v14i3.9758. View

3.
Zhao Z, Anselmo A, Mitragotri S . Viral vector-based gene therapies in the clinic. Bioeng Transl Med. 2022; 7(1):e10258. PMC: 8780015. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10258. View

4.
Cespedes-Tenorio D, Arias-Arias J . The Virus-Induced Cytopathic Effect. Subcell Biochem. 2023; 106:197-210. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-40086-5_7. View

5.
Ogino M, Fedorov Y, Adams D, Okada K, Ito N, Sugiyama M . Vesiculopolins, a New Class of Anti-Vesiculoviral Compounds, Inhibit Transcription Initiation of Vesiculoviruses. Viruses. 2019; 11(9). PMC: 6783830. DOI: 10.3390/v11090856. View