» Articles » PMID: 39125574

Enhancing Veress Needle Entry with Proximal Vibroacoustic Sensing for Automatic Identification of Peritoneum Puncture

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Aug 10
PMID 39125574
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Laparoscopic access, a critical yet challenging step in surgical procedures, often leads to complications. Existing systems, such as improved Veress needles and optical trocars, offer limited safety benefits but come with elevated costs. In this study, a prototype of a novel technology for guiding needle interventions based on vibroacoustic signals is evaluated in porcine cadavers. The prototype consistently detected successful abdominal cavity entry in 100% of cases during 193 insertions across eight porcine cadavers. The high signal quality allowed for the precise identification of all Veress needle insertion phases, including peritoneum puncture. The findings suggest that this vibroacoustic-based guidance technology could enhance surgeons' situational awareness and provide valuable support during laparoscopic access. Unlike existing solutions, this technology does not require sensing elements in the instrument's tip and remains compatible with medical instruments from various manufacturers.

Citing Articles

Initial findings creating a temperature prediction model using vibroacoustic signals originating from tissue needle interactions.

Friebe M, Serwatka W, Steeg K, Krombach G, Oran H, Ozdil O Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7393.

PMID: 40032997 PMC: 11876332. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92202-6.

References
1.
Postema R, Cefai D, Van Straten B, Miedema R, Hardjo L, Dankelman J . A novel Veress needle mechanism that reduces overshooting after puncturing the abdominal wall. Surg Endosc. 2021; 35(10):5857-5866. PMC: 8437840. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08603-x. View

2.
Loftus T, Tighe P, Filiberto A, Efron P, Brakenridge S, Mohr A . Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making. JAMA Surg. 2019; 155(2):148-158. PMC: 7286802. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917. View

3.
Tourinho-Barbosa R, Tobias-Machado M, Castro-Alfaro A, Ogaya-Pinies G, Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R . Complications in robotic urological surgeries and how to avoid them: A systematic review. Arab J Urol. 2018; 16(3):285-292. PMC: 6104661. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.005. View

4.
Yoong W, Saxena S, Mittal M, Stavroulis A, Ogbodo E, Damodaram M . The pressure profile test is more sensitive and specific than Palmer's test in predicting correct placement of the Veress needle. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 152(2):210-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.06.007. View

5.
Li X, Du D, Jiang H . The learning curves of robotic and three-dimensional laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer. J Cancer. 2016; 7(15):2304-2308. PMC: 5166541. DOI: 10.7150/jca.16653. View