» Articles » PMID: 39125564

Prediction of Bone Marrow Metastases Using Computed Tomography (CT) Radiomics in Patients with Gastric Cancer: Uncovering Invisible Metastases

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Aug 10
PMID 39125564
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated whether radiomics of computed tomography (CT) image data enables the differentiation of bone metastases not visible on CT from unaffected bone, using pathologically confirmed bone metastasis as the reference standard, in patients with gastric cancer. In this retrospective study, 96 patients (mean age, 58.4 ± 13.3 years; range, 28-85 years) with pathologically confirmed bone metastasis in iliac bones were included. The dataset was categorized into three feature sets: (1) mean and standard deviation values of attenuation in the region of interest (ROI), (2) radiomic features extracted from the same ROI, and (3) combined features of (1) and (2). Five machine learning models were developed and evaluated using these feature sets, and their predictive performance was assessed. The predictive performance of the best-performing model in the test set (based on the area under the curve [AUC] value) was validated in the external validation group. A Random Forest classifier applied to the combined radiomics and attenuation dataset achieved the highest performance in predicting bone marrow metastasis in patients with gastric cancer (AUC, 0.96), outperforming models using only radiomics or attenuation datasets. Even in the pathology-positive CT-negative group, the model demonstrated the best performance (AUC, 0.93). The model's performance was validated both internally and with an external validation cohort, consistently demonstrating excellent predictive accuracy. Radiomic features derived from CT images can serve as effective imaging biomarkers for predicting bone marrow metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. These findings indicate promising potential for their clinical utility in diagnosing and predicting bone marrow metastasis through routine evaluation of abdominopelvic CT images during follow-up.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting tumor bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tao H, Hui X, Zhang Z, Zhu R, Wang P, Zhou S BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):286.

PMID: 39966724 PMC: 11837447. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13631-0.

References
1.
Lee S, Jain P, Jethwa S, Tripathy D, Yamashita M . Radiologist's role in breast cancer staging: providing key information for clinicians. Radiographics. 2014; 34(2):330-42. DOI: 10.1148/rg.342135071. View

2.
Thrift A, Wenker T, El-Serag H . Global burden of gastric cancer: epidemiological trends, risk factors, screening and prevention. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023; 20(5):338-349. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00747-0. View

3.
Davnall F, Yip C, Ljungqvist G, Selmi M, Ng F, Sanghera B . Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice?. Insights Imaging. 2012; 3(6):573-89. PMC: 3505569. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-012-0196-6. View

4.
Lisson C, Lisson C, Flosdorf K, Mayer-Steinacker R, Schultheiss M, von Baer A . Diagnostic value of MRI-based 3D texture analysis for tissue characterisation and discrimination of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma: a pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2017; 28(2):468-477. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5014-6. View

5.
Kosmin M, Padhani A, Gogbashian A, Woolf D, Ah-See M, Ostler P . Comparison of Whole-Body MRI, CT, and Bone Scintigraphy for Response Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics in Metastatic Breast Cancer to Bone. Radiology. 2020; 297(3):622-629. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192683. View