Comparison of Cricket Protein Powder and Whey Protein Digestibility

Overview

Journal Molecules

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Aug 10

PMID 39125003

Authors

Barbora Lampova

Ivo Doskocil

Petr Smid

Lenka Kourimska

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

With the global population projected to reach nine billion by 2050, the search for alternative protein sources has become critical. This study evaluated the digestibility of cricket protein powder compared with that of whey protein powder. Cricket protein powder had a slightly lower protein content but higher fat content than whey protein powder. Although both contained all essential amino acids, their quantities varied. The most abundant essential amino acid was leucine in both samples. The essential amino acid index (EAAI) for cricket protein powder reached 79% when utilising crude protein for calculation. When using the amino acid sum calculation method, it increased by nearly 13%. The EAAI for whey protein was then 94% when calculated based on crude protein, with a slight increase observed when using the amino acid sum calculation method. Cricket protein exhibited a gradual increase in digestibility during intestinal digestion, reaching nearly 80%, whereas whey protein digestibility surpassed 97%. Despite the lower digestibility of cricket protein compared with whey protein, it remains sufficiently high for consideration as a valuable protein source. This study highlights the potential of cricket proteins and underscores the importance of assessing their protein content and digestibility in evaluating their nutritional value.

References

Rodriguez-Rodriguez M, Barroso F, Fabrikov D, Sanchez-Muros M . In Vitro Crude Protein Digestibility of Insects: A Review. Insects. 2022; 13(8). PMC: 9409466. DOI: 10.3390/insects13080682. View

van Huis A . Edible insects are the future?. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016; 75(3):294-305. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665116000069. View

Stull V, Finer E, Bergmans R, Febvre H, Longhurst C, Manter D . Impact of Edible Cricket Consumption on Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adults, a Double-blind, Randomized Crossover Trial. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):10762. PMC: 6050247. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29032-2. View

Manditsera F, Luning P, Fogliano V, Lakemond C . Effect of domestic cooking methods on protein digestibility and mineral bioaccessibility of wild harvested adult edible insects. Food Res Int. 2019; 121:404-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.052. View

Raheem D, Raposo A, Oluwole O, Nieuwland M, Saraiva A, Carrascosa C . Entomophagy: Nutritional, ecological, safety and legislation aspects. Food Res Int. 2019; 126:108672. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108672. View

Siddiqi R, Singh T, Rani M, Sogi D, Bhat M . Diversity in Grain, Flour, Amino Acid Composition, Protein Profiling, and Proportion of Total Flour Proteins of Different Wheat Cultivars of North India. Front Nutr. 2020; 7:141. PMC: 7506077. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00141. View

Stone A, Tanaka T, Nickerson M . Protein quality and physicochemical properties of commercial cricket and mealworm powders. J Food Sci Technol. 2019; 56(7):3355-3363. PMC: 6582163. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-03818-2. View

Kroger T, Dupont J, Busing L, Fiebelkorn F . Acceptance of Insect-Based Food Products in Western Societies: A Systematic Review. Front Nutr. 2022; 8:759885. PMC: 8901202. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.759885. View

Huecker M, Sarav M, Pearlman M, Laster J . Protein Supplementation in Sport: Source, Timing, and Intended Benefits. Curr Nutr Rep. 2019; 8(4):382-396. DOI: 10.1007/s13668-019-00293-1. View

10.

Oonincx D, Van Itterbeeck J, Heetkamp M, van den Brand H, van Loon J, van Huis A . An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption. PLoS One. 2011; 5(12):e14445. PMC: 3012052. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014445. View

11.

Hermans W, Senden J, Churchward-Venne T, Paulussen K, Fuchs C, Smeets J . Insects are a viable protein source for human consumption: from insect protein digestion to postprandial muscle protein synthesis in vivo in humans: a double-blind randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021; 114(3):934-944. PMC: 8408844. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab115. View

12.

Barber T, Kabisch S, Pfeiffer A, Weickert M . The Health Benefits of Dietary Fibre. Nutrients. 2020; 12(10). PMC: 7589116. DOI: 10.3390/nu12103209. View

13.

Brodkorb A, Egger L, Alminger M, Alvito P, Assuncao R, Ballance S . INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion. Nat Protoc. 2019; 14(4):991-1014. DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0119-1. View

14.

Fernandez-Garcia E, Carvajal-Lerida I, Perez-Galvez A . In vitro bioaccessibility assessment as a prediction tool of nutritional efficiency. Nutr Res. 2009; 29(11):751-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2009.09.016. View

15.

Murugu D, Onyango A, Ndiritu A, Osuga I, Xavier C, Nakimbugwe D . From Farm to Fork: Crickets as Alternative Source of Protein, Minerals, and Vitamins. Front Nutr. 2021; 8:704002. PMC: 8382788. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.704002. View

16.

Montowska M, Kowalczewski P, Rybicka I, Fornal E . Nutritional value, protein and peptide composition of edible cricket powders. Food Chem. 2019; 289:130-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.062. View

17.

Liu H, Zhang J, Chen Q, Hu A, Li T, Guo F . Preparation of Whole-Cut Plant-Based Pork Meat and Its Quality Evaluation with Animal Meat. Gels. 2023; 9(6). PMC: 10297619. DOI: 10.3390/gels9060461. View

18.

Adhikari S, Schop M, De Boer I, Huppertz T . Protein Quality in Perspective: A Review of Protein Quality Metrics and Their Applications. Nutrients. 2022; 14(5). PMC: 8912699. DOI: 10.3390/nu14050947. View

19.

Hawkey K, Lopez-Viso C, Brameld J, Parr T, Salter A . Insects: A Potential Source of Protein and Other Nutrients for Feed and Food. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2020; 9:333-354. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083930. View