» Articles » PMID: 39124798

Evaluation of Anatomical and Tomographic Biomarkers As Predictive Visual Acuity Factors in Eyes with Retinal Vein Occlusion Treated with Dexamethasone Implant

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Aug 10
PMID 39124798
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective study evaluated the impact of anatomical and tomographic biomarkers on clinical outcomes of intravitreal dexamethasone implants in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). : The study included 46 patients (28 with branch RVO (BRVO) and 18 with central RVO (CRVO)). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved from a mean baseline of 0.817 ± 0.220 logMAR to 0.663 ± 0.267 logMAR at six months and 0.639 ± 0.321 logMAR at twelve months ( < 0.05). Central retinal thickness (CRT) showed a significant reduction from 666.2 ± 212.2 µm to 471.1 ± 215.6 µm at six months and 467 ± 175.7 µm at twelve months ( < 0.05). No significant differences were found in OCT biomarkers between baseline and follow-ups. : The study analysed improvements in visual acuity relative to baseline biomarkers. At six months, ellipsoid zone disruption (EZD) was significant for all subgroups. Disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), external limiting membrane (ELM) disruption, macular ischemia (MI), CRT, and BRVO showed significance for any improvement, while DRIL and ELM were significant for changes greater than 0.3 logMAR ( < 0.05). At twelve months, EZD remained significant for all subgroups. ELM, MI, CRT, and BRVO were significant for any improvement, while MI and BRVO were significant for changes greater than 0.3 logMAR ( < 0.05). Hyperreflective foci were not statistically significant at either time point ( > 0.05). : The regression model suggested that MI and CRVO could be negative predictive factors for visual outcomes, while ELM and EZD were associated with BCVA improvement one-year post-treatment.

References
1.
Castro-Navarro V, Monferrer-Adsuara C, Navarro-Palop C, Montero-Hernandez J, Cervera-Taulet E . Optical coherence tomography biomarkers in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion treated with dexamethasone implant. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22(1):191. PMC: 9040324. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02415-w. View

2.
Castro-Navarro V, Monferrer-Adsuara C, Navarro-Palop C, Montero-Hernandez J, Cervera-Taulet E . Effect of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant on Visual Acuity and Foveal Photoreceptor Integrity in Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vascular Disease. Ophthalmologica. 2020; 244(1):83-92. DOI: 10.1159/000512195. View

3.
Ji K, Zhang Q, Tian M, Xing Y . Comparison of dexamethasone intravitreal implant with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(22):e15798. PMC: 6709010. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015798. View

4.
Mo B, Zhou H, Jiao X, Zhang F . Evaluation of hyperreflective foci as a prognostic factor of visual outcome in retinal vein occlusion. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017; 10(4):605-612. PMC: 5406640. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.04.17. View

5.
Wons J, Pfau M, Wirth M, Freiberg F, Becker M, Michels S . Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of the Foveal Avascular Zone in Retinal Vein Occlusion. Ophthalmologica. 2016; 235(4):195-202. DOI: 10.1159/000445482. View