Safe Transition from Open to Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer Utilizing Process Management Methodology

Overview

Journal J Clin Med

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Aug 10

PMID 39124631

Authors

Milos Bjelovic

Dragan Gunjic

Tamara Babic

Milan Veselinovic

Marija Djukanovic

Dario Potkonjak

Vladimir Milosavljevic

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The global shift from open esophagectomy (OE) to minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer is well-established. Recent data indicate that transitioning from hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (hMIE) to total minimally invasive esophagectomy (tMIE) can be challenging due to concerns about higher leakage rates and lower lymph node counts, especially at the beginning of the learning curve. This study aimed to demonstrate that a safe transition from OE to tMIE for cancer is possible using process management methodology. Methods: A step-change approach was adopted in process management planning, with hMIE serving as an intermediate step between OE and tMIE. This single-center, case-control study included 150 patients who underwent the Ivor Lewis procedure with curative intent for esophageal cancer. Among these patients, 50 underwent OE, 50 hMIE (laparoscopic procedure followed by conventional right thoracotomy), and 50 tMIE (laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach). A preceptored training scheme was implemented during execution, and treatment results were monitored and controlled to ensure a safe transition. Results: During the transition, the tMIE group was not worse than the hMIE and OE groups regarding operation duration ( = 0.135), overall postoperative complications ( = 0.020), anastomotic leakage rates ( = 0.773), 30-day mortality ( = 1.0), and oncological outcomes (based on R status ( = 0.628) and 2-year survival ( = 0.967)). Additionally, the tMIE group showed superior results in terms of major postoperative pulmonary complications ( = 0.004) and ICU stay duration ( < 0.001). Utilizing managerial methodology and practice in surgery, as a bridge between interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches, demonstrated that transitioning from OE to tMIE, with hMIE as an intermediate step, is safe and feasible without compromising outcomes.

References

Hulscher J, van Sandick J, de Boer A, Wijnhoven B, Tijssen J, Fockens P . Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(21):1662-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022343. View

Saddoughi S, Mitchell K, Antonoff M, Fruth K, Taswell J, Mounajjed T . Analysis of Esophagectomy Margin Practice and Survival Implications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021; 113(1):209-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.01.028. View

Brzoszczyk B, Milecki T, Jarzemski P, Antczak A, Antoniewicz A, Kolodziej A . Urology resident training in laparoscopic surgery - results of the first national survey in Poland. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019; 14(3):433-441. PMC: 6748061. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.81439. View

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-13. PMC: 1360123. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. View

Tsai T, Miller J, Andolfi C, Whang B, Fisichella P . Surgical evaluation of lymph nodes in esophageal adenocarcinoma: Standardized approach or personalized medicine?. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018; 44(8):1177-1180. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.007. View

Grimminger P, Tagkalos E, Hadzijusufovic E, Corvinus F, Babic B, Lang H . Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 67(7):589-596. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1670664. View

. International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA). World J Surg. 2019; 43(11):2874-2884. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05080-1. View

Hoelzen J, Frankauer B, Szardenings C, Roy D, Pollmann L, Fortmann L . Reducing the Risks of Esophagectomies: A Retrospective Comparison of Hybrid versus Full-Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) Approaches. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(18). PMC: 10531670. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185823. View

Fumagalli U, Baiocchi G, Celotti A, Parise P, Cossu A, Bonavina L . Incidence and treatment of mediastinal leakage after esophagectomy: Insights from the multicenter study on mediastinal leaks. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25(3):356-366. PMC: 6343094. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.356. View

10.

Bonavina L, Scolari F, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, Sironi A, Saino G . Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis. Surgery. 2015; 159(4):1073-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.019. View

11.

Nederlof N, Slaman A, van Hagen P, van der Gaast A, Slankamenac K, Gisbertz S . Using the Comprehensive Complication Index to Assess the Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Complication Severity After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23(12):3964-3971. PMC: 5047940. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5291-3. View

12.

Haverkamp L, Seesing M, Ruurda J, Boone J, V Hillegersberg R . Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2016; 30(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1111/dote.12480. View

13.

Nebbia M, Kotze P, Spinelli A . Training on Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery during Surgical Residency: Integrating Surgical Education and Advanced Techniques. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021; 34(3):194-200. PMC: 8007239. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722843. View

14.

Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Rosman C, Roig J, Scheepers J . Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers. Surg Endosc. 2016; 31(1):119-126. PMC: 5216077. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4938-2. View

15.

Fuchs H, Muller D, Leers J, Schroder W, Bruns C . Modular step-up approach to robot-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy-experience of a German high volume center. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 4:62. PMC: 6737436. DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2019.07.04. View

16.

Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H, Sun W . Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016; 14(1):304. PMC: 5143462. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7. View

17.

Kahlert C, Janda M, Weitz J . [Process management in surgery]. Chirurg. 2021; 92(3):237-243. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01343-z. View

18.

Bonavina L, Asti E, Sironi A, Bernardi D, Aiolfi A . Hybrid and total minimally invasive esophagectomy: how I do it. J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9(Suppl 8):S761-S772. PMC: 5538984. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.55. View

19.

Obermannova R, Alsina M, Cervantes A, Leong T, Lordick F, Nilsson M . Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022; 33(10):992-1004. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.003. View

20.

Biere S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Maas K, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia J . Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 379(9829):1887-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. View