» Articles » PMID: 39124585

Pulse Pressure As a Hemodynamic Parameter in Preeclampsia with Severe Features Accompanied by Fetal Growth Restriction

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Aug 10
PMID 39124585
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Modern management of preeclampsia can be optimized by tailoring the targeted treatment of hypertension to an individual's hemodynamic profile. Growing evidence suggests different phenotypes of preeclampsia, including those with a hyperdynamic profile and those complicated by uteroplacental insufficiency. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is believed to be a result of uteroplacental insufficiency. There is a paucity of research examining the characteristics of patients with severe preeclampsia who do and who do not develop FGR. We aimed to elucidate which hemodynamic parameters differed between these two groups. : All patients admitted to a single referral center with severe preeclampsia were identified. Patients were included if they had a live birth at 23 weeks of gestation or higher. Multiple gestations and pregnancies complicated by fetal congenital anomalies and/or HELLP syndrome were excluded. FGR was defined as a sonographic estimation of fetal weight (EFW) < 10th percentile or abdominal circumference (AC) < 10th percentile. : There were 76% significantly lower odds of overall pulse pressure upon admission for those with severe preeclampsia comorbid with FGR (aOR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07-0.83). Advanced gestational age on admission was associated with lower odds of severely abnormal labs and severely elevated diastolic blood pressure in preeclampsia also complicated by FGR. : Subtypes of preeclampsia with and without FGR may be hemodynamically evaluated by assessing pulse pressure on admission.

References
1.
London G, Guerin A . Influence of arterial pulse and reflected waves on blood pressure and cardiac function. Am Heart J. 1999; 138(3 Pt 2):220-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70313-3. View

2.
Easterling T, Benedetti T, Schmucker B, Millard S . Maternal hemodynamics in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies: a longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 76(6):1061-9. View

3.
Chae C, Pfeffer M, Glynn R, Mitchell G, Taylor J, Hennekens C . Increased pulse pressure and risk of heart failure in the elderly. JAMA. 1999; 281(7):634-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.7.634. View

4.
Shekhar S, Gupta N, Kirubakaran R, Pareek P . Oral nifedipine versus intravenous labetalol for severe hypertension during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2015; 123(1):40-7. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13463. View

5.
Xiong X, Demianczuk N, Saunders L, Wang F, Fraser W . Impact of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension on birth weight by gestational age. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 155(3):203-9. DOI: 10.1093/aje/155.3.203. View