Preferences of Iranian Smokers Regarding Smart Smoking Cessation Technologies: a Parallel Convergent Mixed Methods Study

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Aug 9

PMID 39123187

Authors

Mohammad Hasan Sahebihagh

Mina Hosseinzadeh

Mojgan Mirghafourvand

Parvin Sarbakhsh

Hossein Nemati

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Considering the values and preferences of individuals who attempt to quit smoking is a crucial step in the development of smoking cessation technologies. This study aimed to explore preferences regarding smart smoking cessation technologies.

Methods: This parallel convergent mixed-methods study was conducted in two phases: quantitative and qualitative. In the quantitative phase, a cross-sectional study was conducted with 360 participants selected through stratified random sampling from technology-based smoking cessation clinics in Tabriz, Tehran, and Karaj cities in Iran. Data on demographic characteristics and preferences for smart smoking cessation technologies were collected using questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics. In the qualitative phase, 25 users of these technologies were selected through purposeful and snowball sampling. The data were gathered through in-depth semistructured interviews and analyzed using qualitative content analysis with a conventional approach. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated using the merging strategy and convergence model.

Results: The quantitative phase results indicated that the highest preference was related to wearing and using a smartwatch for smoking cessation and using mobile apps. In the qualitative phase, 17 subcategories were extracted and classified into 8 main categories: high effectiveness, better management of the smoking cessation process, personalized technology, safe and uncomplicated technologies, attractiveness and innovative design, scientific basis, mobile applications, and smart monitoring devices.

Conclusion: By combining and integrating quantitative and qualitative results, it can be concluded that users are more interested in wearable technologies and interactive mobile applications. The findings of this study can assist smoking cessation technology developers in designing and improving their tools based on user needs and preferences to enhance their effectiveness and acceptability.

References

Prutzman Y, Wiseman K, Grady M, Budenz A, Grenen E, Vercammen L . Using Digital Technologies to Reach Tobacco Users Who Want to Quit: Evidence From the National Cancer Institute's Smokefree.gov Initiative. Am J Prev Med. 2021; 60(3 Suppl 2):S172-S184. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.008. View

Horvath M, Pittman B, OMalley S, Grutman A, Khan N, Gueorguieva R . Smartband-based smoking detection and real-time brief mindfulness intervention: findings from a feasibility clinical trial. Ann Med. 2024; 56(1):2352803. PMC: 11146247. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2352803. View

Barroso-Hurtado M, Suarez-Castro D, Martinez-Vispo C, Becona E, Lopez-Duran A . Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(21). PMC: 8583115. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111664. View

Sweileh W . Technology-based interventions for tobacco smoking prevention and treatment: a 20-year bibliometric analysis (2003-2022). Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024; 19(1):13. PMC: 10848402. DOI: 10.1186/s13011-024-00595-w. View

Struik L, Christianson K, Khan S, Sharma R . Strengths and Limitations of Web-Based Cessation Support for Individuals Who Smoke, Dual Use, or Vape: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e43096. PMC: 10746965. DOI: 10.2196/43096. View

Zeng E, Vilardaga R, Heffner J, Mull K, Bricker J . Predictors of Utilization of a Novel Smoking Cessation Smartphone App. Telemed J E Health. 2015; 21(12):998-1004. PMC: 4776539. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0232. View

Sin M, Ro K . Factors Influencing Smoking Decisions Among Older Korean American Men: A Qualitative Study. J Addict Nurs. 2021; 34(1):E39-E44. DOI: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000429. View

Graneheim U, LUNDMAN B . Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24(2):105-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001. View

Hersi M, Traversy G, Thombs B, Beck A, Skidmore B, Groulx S . Effectiveness of stop smoking interventions among adults: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and an updated systematic review. Syst Rev. 2019; 8(1):28. PMC: 6339342. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0928-x. View

10.

Lafferty C, Heaney C, Chen Jr M . Assessing decisional balance for smoking cessation among Southeast Asian males in the US. Health Educ Res. 1999; 14(1):139-46. DOI: 10.1093/her/14.1.139. View

11.

Sawyer C, McKeon G, Hassan L, Onyweaka H, Martinez Agulleiro L, Guinart D . Digital health behaviour change interventions in severe mental illness: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2023; 53(15):6965-7005. PMC: 10719689. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291723002064. View

12.

Matthews A, Sanchez-Johnsen L, King A . Development of a culturally targeted smoking cessation intervention for African American smokers. J Community Health. 2009; 34(6):480-92. PMC: 3712791. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-009-9181-5. View

13.

Smiley S . Sociodemographic correlates of intention to quit smoking for good among U.S. adult menthol and non-menthol smokers: Evidence from the 2013-2014 National Adult Tobacco Survey. Tob Prev Cessat. 2020; 4:22. PMC: 7205077. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/90968. View

14.

Albers N, Neerincx M, Penfornis K, Brinkman W . Users' needs for a digital smoking cessation application and how to address them: A mixed-methods study. PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13824. PMC: 9394512. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13824. View

15.

Bricker J, Mull K, Kientz J, Vilardaga R, Mercer L, Akioka K . Randomized, controlled pilot trial of a smartphone app for smoking cessation using acceptance and commitment therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 143:87-94. PMC: 4201179. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.006. View

16.

Austin Z, Sutton J . Qualitative research: getting started. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014; 67(6):436-40. PMC: 4275140. DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406. View

17.

Vinci C, Haslam A, Lam C, Kumar S, Wetter D . The use of ambulatory assessment in smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2018; 83:18-24. PMC: 5964000. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.01.018. View

18.

Chaiton M, Diemert L, Cohen J, Bondy S, Selby P, Philipneri A . Estimating the number of quit attempts it takes to quit smoking successfully in a longitudinal cohort of smokers. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(6):e011045. PMC: 4908897. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011045. View

19.

Creamer M, Wang T, Babb S, Cullen K, Day H, Willis G . Tobacco Product Use and Cessation Indicators Among Adults - United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019; 68(45):1013-1019. PMC: 6855510. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6845a2. View

20.

Bold K, Garrison K, DeLucia A, Horvath M, Nguyen M, Camacho E . Smartphone Apps for Smoking Cessation: Systematic Framework for App Review and Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45183. PMC: 10375280. DOI: 10.2196/45183. View