» Articles » PMID: 39121103

The Geography of COVID-19 Vaccine Completion by Age in North Carolina, U.S

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Aug 9
PMID 39121103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Geographic variation in COVID-19 vaccination can create areas at higher risk of infection, complications, and death, exacerbating health inequalities. This ecological study examined geographic patterns of COVID-19 vaccine completion, using age and sociodemographic characteristics as possible explanatory mechanisms.

Methods And Findings: Using 2020-2022 data from the North Carolina COVID-19 Vaccination Management System and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey, at the Zip code-level, we evaluated completion of the primary COVID-19 vaccine series across age groups. We examined geographic clustering of age-specific completion by Zip code and evaluated similarity of the age-specific geographic patterns. Using unadjusted and adjusted spatial autoregressive models, we examined associations between sociodemographic characteristics and age-specific vaccine completion. COVID-19 vaccine completion was moderately geographically clustered in younger groups, with lower clustering in older groups. Urban areas had clusters of higher vaccine completion. Younger and middle-aged groups were the most similar in completion geographically, while the oldest group was most dissimilar to other age groups. Higher income was associated with higher completion in adjusted models across all age groups, while a higher percent of Black residents was associated with higher completion for some groups.

Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination completion is more variable among younger age groups in North Carolina, and it is higher in urban areas with higher income. Higher completion in areas with more Black residents may reflect the success of racial equity efforts in the state. The findings show a need to reach younger populations and lower income areas that were not prioritized during early vaccination distribution.

References
1.
Li M, Luo Y, Watson R, Zheng Y, Ren J, Tang J . Healthcare workers' (HCWs) attitudes and related factors towards COVID-19 vaccination: a rapid systematic review. Postgrad Med J. 2023; 99(1172):520-528. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140195. View

2.
Qiao S, Li Z, Zhang J, Sun X, Garrett C, Li X . Social Capital, Urbanization Level, and COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake in the United States: A National Level Analysis. Vaccines (Basel). 2022; 10(4). PMC: 9025929. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10040625. View

3.
Lazarus J, Ratzan S, Palayew A, Gostin L, Larson H, Rabin K . A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med. 2020; 27(2):225-228. PMC: 7573523. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9. View

4.
Wong C, Dowler S, Moore A, Sosne E, Young H, Tenenbaum J . COVID-19 Vaccine Administration, by Race and Ethnicity - North Carolina, December 14, 2020-April 6, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021; 70(28):991-996. PMC: 8314707. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7028a2. View

5.
Williams N, Tutrow H, Pina P, Belli H, Ogedegbe G, Schoenthaler A . Assessment of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to COVID-19 Vaccination Sites in Brooklyn, New York. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(6):e2113937. PMC: 8214153. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13937. View