» Articles » PMID: 39120119

Outcomes of Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in On- Versus Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Abstract

Objectives: A considerable number of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery suffer from atrial fibrillation and should be treated concomitantly. This manuscript evaluates the impact of on-pump versus off-pump bypass grafting on the applied lesion set and rhythm outcome.

Methods: Between January 2017 and April 2020, patients who underwent combined bypass grafting and surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation were consecutively enrolled in the German CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation registry (CASE-AF, 17 centres). Data were prospectively collected. Follow-up was planned after one year.

Results: A total of 224 patients were enrolled. No differences in baseline characteristics were seen between on- and off-pump bypass grafting, especially not in type of atrial fibrillation and left atrial size. In the on-pump group (n = 171, 76%), pulmonary vein isolation and an extended left atrial lesion set were performed more often compared to off-pump bypass grafting (58% vs 26%, 33 vs 9%, respectively, P < 0.001). In off-pump bypass grafting a box isolating the atrial posterior wall was the dominant lesion (72% off-pump vs 42% on-pump, P < 0.001). Left atrial appendage management was comparable in on-pump versus off-pump bypass grafting (94% vs 91%, P = 0.37). Sinus rhythm at follow-up was confirmed in 61% in the on-pump group and in 65% in the off-pump group (P = 0.66). No differences were seen in in-hospital or follow-up complication-rates between the two groups.

Conclusions: In coronary artery bypass grafting patients undergoing concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation, our data suggests that the technique applied for myocardial revascularization (off-pump vs on-pump) leads to differences in the ablation lesion set, but not in safety and effectiveness.

References
1.
Taha A, Hjarpe A, Martinsson A, Nielsen S, Barbu M, Pivodic A . Cardiopulmonary bypass management and risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023; 37(3). PMC: 10533753. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivad153. View

2.
Wehbe M, Albert M, Lewalter T, Ouarrak T, Senges J, Hanke T . The German CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation Registry: In-Hospital Outcomes. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 71(4):243-254. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730969. View

3.
Romero J, Di Biase L, Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Patel K, Parides M . Long-Term Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation in Patients With Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020; 13(11):e008390. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008390. View

4.
Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B . 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(38):2893-2962. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. View

5.
Wehbe M, Albert M, Lewalter T, Ouarrak T, Senges J, Hanke T . The German Cardiosurgery Atrial Fibrillation Registry: 1-Year Follow-up Outcomes. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022; 71(4):255-263. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750311. View