» Articles » PMID: 39118720

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Medicine Among Physicians in Sudan: a National Cross-sectional Survey

Abstract

Background And Aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a rapidly developing tool within the medical landscape, globally aiding in diagnosis and healthcare management. However, its integration within healthcare systems remains varied across different regions. In Sudan, there exists a burgeoning interest in AI potential applications within medicine. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of AI applications in medicine among physicians in Sudan.

Methods: The authors conducted a web-based survey cross-sectional analytical study using an online questionnaire-based survey regarding demographic details, knowledge, attitudes, and practice of AI distributing through various e-mail listings and social media platforms. A sample of 825 Physicians including doctors in Sudan with different ranks and specialties were selected using the convenient non-probability sampling technique.

Result: Out of 825 Physicians, 666 (80.7%) of Physicians have previous knowledge about AI. However, only a small number 123 (14.9%) were taught about AI during their time in medical school, even fewer, just 120 (14.5%) had AI-related lessons in their training program. Regarding attitude, 675 (81.8%) agree that AI is very important in medicine, almost the same number, 681 (82.6%) support the idea of teaching AI in medical schools. Practically, 535 (64.8%) of doctors, think that should get special training in using AI tools in healthcare. Excitingly 651 (78.9%) of physicians are interested in working with AI in future. Based on different ranks of doctors toward AI; Medical Officers exhibited the highest proportion at (32.7%) of knowledge and understanding of AI concepts, followed by House Officers at (16.7%) (=0.076); regarding attitude, Medical Officers demonstrated the highest (31.6%) favorable attitude, followed by House Officers at (17.5%) (=0.229); In practice also, Medical Officer showed the highest portion (28.0%) among participants (=0.129).

Conclusion: While there is a positive attitude and some level of AI practice, there remains a considerable gap in knowledge that needs addressing.

References
1.
Niazi M, Parwani A, Gurcan M . Digital pathology and artificial intelligence. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(5):e253-e261. PMC: 8711251. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30154-8. View

2.
Mathew G, Agha R, Albrecht J, Goel P, Mukherjee I, Pai P . STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery. Int J Surg. 2021; 96:106165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. View

3.
Doraiswamy P, Blease C, Bodner K . Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Insights from a global physician survey. Artif Intell Med. 2020; 102:101753. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101753. View

4.
Hoodbhoy Z, Masroor Jeelani S, Aziz A, Habib M, Iqbal B, Akmal W . Machine Learning for Child and Adolescent Health: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2020; 147(1). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-011833. View

5.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe M, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A . Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs. JAMA. 2016; 316(22):2402-2410. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.17216. View