» Articles » PMID: 39115220

Clinical Effect and Prognostic Factor of Electric Stimulation and Biofeedback Therapy on Postpartum Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Overview
Date 2024 Aug 8
PMID 39115220
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore the effects of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy in patients with postpartum pelvic organ prolapse and to identify factors that can affect therapeutic efficacy outcomes.

Method: This retrospective study analysed clinical data about patients with postpartum pelvic organ prolapse. A total of 328 women with pelvic organ prolapse at 6 weeks postpartum were recruited from one tertiary hospitals in Sichuan province in China, between March 2019 and March 2022. The prognostic factors of therapeutic efficacy were analysed using logistic regression and decision tree model.

Results: Overall, 259 women showed clinical benefits from the treatment. The logistic regression model showed that parity, pelvic floor muscle training at home, and the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment were independent prognostic factors. The decision tree model showed that the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment was the main prognostic factor, followed by parity. There was no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between the two models.

Conclusion: Parity, pelvic floor muscle training at home, and the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation stage before treatment were important prognostic factors of electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse.

References
1.
Noe G, Barnard A, Schiermeier S, Anapolski M . Current Role of Hysterectomy in Pelvic Floor Surgery: Time for Reappraisal? A Review of Current Literature and Expert Discussion. Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:9934486. PMC: 8279866. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9934486. View

2.
Wang Q, Zhao Y, Huang L, Zhang J, Shen W . [Evaluation of the effect of electrical stimulation combined with biofeedback therapy for postpartum pelvic organ prolapse: a static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging study]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019; 99(5):375-379. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.05.011. View

3.
Bump R, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker L, DeLancey J, Klarskov P . The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175(1):10-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0. View

4.
Wu J, Hundley A, Fulton R, Myers E . Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114(6):1278-1283. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96. View

5.
Lawson S, Sacks A . Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and Women's Health Promotion. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018; 63(4):410-417. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12736. View