» Articles » PMID: 39114792

The Impact of Systematically Repairing Multiple Choice Questions with Low Discrimination on Assessment Reliability: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Overview
Journal Can Med Educ J
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 Aug 8
PMID 39114792
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

At our centre, we introduced a continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiative during academic year 2018-19 targeting for repair multiple choice question (MCQ) items with discrimination index () < 0.1. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this initiative on reliability/internal consistency of our assessments. Our participants were medical students during academic years 2015-16 to 2020-21 and our data were summative MCQ assessments during this time. Since the goal was to systematically review and improve summative assessments in our undergraduate program on an ongoing basis, we used interrupted time series analysis to assess the impact on reliability. Between 2015-16 and 2017-18 there was a significant negative trend in the mean alpha coefficient for MCQ exams (regression coefficient -0.027 [-0.008, -0.047], = 0.024). In the academic year following the introduction of our initiative (2018-19) there was a significant increase in the mean alpha coefficient (regression coefficient 0.113 [0.063, 0.163], = 0.010) which was then followed by a significant positive post-intervention trend (regression coefficient 0.056 [0.037, 0.075], = 0.006). In conclusion, our CQI intervention resulted in an immediate and progressive improvement reliability of our MCQ assessments.

Citing Articles

Teaching suicide prevention: a Canadian medical education conundrum.

DEon M, Komrad M, Bannon J Can Med Educ J. 2024; 15(3):1-5.

PMID: 39114769 PMC: 11302761. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.79624.

References
1.
Cook D, Brydges R, Ginsburg S, Hatala R . A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework. Med Educ. 2015; 49(6):560-75. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12678. View

2.
Mandin H, Harasym P, Eagle C, Watanabe M . Developing a "clinical presentation" curriculum at the University of Calgary. Acad Med. 1995; 70(3):186-93. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199503000-00008. View

3.
Jiang S, Wang C, Weiss D . Sample Size Requirements for Estimation of Item Parameters in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:109. PMC: 4746434. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00109. View

4.
De Champlain A . A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. Med Educ. 2010; 44(1):109-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03425.x. View

5.
Schuwirth L, Van Der Vleuten C, Donkers H . A closer look at cueing effects in multiple-choice questions. Med Educ. 1996; 30(1):44-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00716.x. View