» Articles » PMID: 39110388

Rethinking Tuberculosis Morbidity Quantification: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of TB Disability Weights in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2024 Aug 7
PMID 39110388
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The disability-adjusted life year (DALY), a key metric for health resource allocation, encompasses morbidity through disability weights. Widely used in tuberculosis cost-effectiveness analysis (CEAs), DALYs play a significant role in informing intervention adopt/reject decisions. This study reviews the values and consistency of disability weights applied in tuberculosis-related CEAs.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review using the Tufts CEA database, updated to July 2023 with searches in Embase, Scopus and PubMed. Eligible studies needed to have included a cost-per-DALY ratio, and additionally either evaluated a tuberculosis (TB) intervention or included tuberculosis-related weights. We considered all tuberculosis health states: with/without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection, TB treatments and treatment side effects. Data were screened and extracted independently by combinations of two authors.

Findings: A total of 105 studies spanning 2002-2023 across 50 countries (mainly low- and middle-income countries) were extracted. Disability weights were sourced primarily from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD; 100/165; 61%), with 17 non-GBD studies additionally referenced, along with primary derivation. Inconsistencies in the utilisation of weights were evident: of the 100 usages of GBD-sourced weights, only in 47 instances (47%) had the weight value been explicitly specified with an appropriate up-to-date reference cited (constituting 28% of all weight usages, 47/165). Sensitivity analyses on weight values had been conducted in 30% of studies (31/105). Twelve studies did not clearly specify weights or their sources; nine further calculated DALYs without morbidity. The review suggests methodological gaps in current approaches for representing important aspects of TB, including TB-HIV coinfection, treatment, drug-resistance, extrapulmonary TB and psychological impacts. We propose a set of best practice recommendations.

Interpretation: There is a need for increased rigour in the application, sensitivity testing and reporting of TB disability weights. Furthermore, there appears a desire among researchers to reflect elements of the tuberculosis experience beyond those allowed for by GBD disability weights.

References
1.
Johnson K, Churchyard G, Sohn H, Dowdy D . Cost-effectiveness of Preventive Therapy for Tuberculosis With Isoniazid and Rifapentine Versus Isoniazid Alone in High-Burden Settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2018; 67(7):1072-1078. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy230. View

2.
Goodchild M, Sahu S, Wares F, Dewan P, Shukla R, Chauhan L . A cost-benefit analysis of scaling up tuberculosis control in India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011; 15(3):358-62. View

3.
Nsengiyumva N, Campbell J, Oxlade O, Vesga J, Lienhardt C, Trajman A . Scaling up target regimens for tuberculosis preventive treatment in Brazil and South Africa: An analysis of costs and cost-effectiveness. PLoS Med. 2022; 19(6):e1004032. PMC: 9239450. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004032. View

4.
Alene K, Wangdi K, Colquhoun S, Chani K, Islam T, Rahevar K . Tuberculosis related disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2021; 19(1):203. PMC: 8426113. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02063-9. View

5.
Fekadu G, Wang Y, You J . Standard diagnostics with and without urine-based lipoarabinomannan testing for tuberculosis disease in HIV-infected patients in a high-burden setting-A cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288605. PMC: 10348570. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288605. View