Fifty Years of Research on Psychosocial Working Conditions and Health: From Promise to Practice

Overview

Journal Scand J Work Environ Health

Specialties Environmental Health
Occupational Medicine

Date 2024 Aug 7

PMID 39110008

Authors

Cecile R L Boot

Anthony D LaMontagne

Ida E H Madsen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: This paper presents an overview of 50 years of research on psychosocial working conditions and health with regards to conceptualization, interventions and policy. We reflect on the promise of past and current research on psychosocial working conditions and, in addition, discuss current progress in translating this research into workplace practice and improvements in people's working lives.

Methods: We conducted a narrative review of meta-reviews and key publications on psychosocial working conditions and health. The review covers a historical overview of theories of the past 50 years, measurement of psychosocial working conditions, health effects, intervention research, and policy development on psychosocial working conditions.

Results: Psychosocial working conditions are conceptualized in different ways, with increasing complexity in the understanding developing over time. Exposures related to psychosocial working conditions are associated with a wide range of health outcomes, in particular cardiovascular disease and mental health conditions. In response to growing evidence on associations between psychosocial working conditions and health outcomes, intervention research has expanded rapidly, but for various reasons the evidence base is stronger and more extensive for individual- than organizational-level interventions. This individual/organizational imbalance is reflected in practice, and may partly explain why policy interventions have yet to show reductions in exposures to psychosocial work factors and associated adverse outcomes.

Conclusions: Pressing needs for advancing the field include improvements in capturing exposure dynamics, developing objective measures of exposure, methodologic advancements to optimize causal inference in etiologic studies, and alternatives to randomized controlled trials for intervention evaluation.

Citing Articles

Evidence-based interventions to prevent sick leave: a scoping review of reviews.

Bosma E, Grigore D, Abma F, Proper K, Loef B BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):751.

PMID: 39994671 PMC: 11849166. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21911-4.

Effective management for the duration and quality of working time.

Takahashi M Ind Health. 2025; 63(1):1-2.

PMID: 39864835 PMC: 11780265. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.63_100.

The Psychosocial Hierarchy of Controls: Effectively Reducing Psychosocial Hazards at Work.

Kjaergaard A, Rudolf E, Palmqvist J, Jakobsen M, Ajslev J Am J Ind Med. 2024; 68(3):250-263.

PMID: 39707860 PMC: 11834945. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23694.

Risk factors for adverse health in military and law enforcement personnel; an umbrella review.

Stegerhoek P, Kooijman K, Ziesemer K, IJzerman H, Kuijer P, Verhagen E BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3151.

PMID: 39538210 PMC: 11562480. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20553-2.

Towards the year 2049: The next 25 years of occupational health and safety research.

Ropponen A, Rugulies R, Burdorf A Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024; 50(8):581-587.

PMID: 39535910 PMC: 11616482. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4200.

References

Benach J, Solar O, Santana V, Castedo A, Chung H, Muntaner C . A micro-level model of employment relations and health inequalities. Int J Health Serv. 2010; 40(2):223-7. DOI: 10.2190/HS.40.2.d. View

FRANKENHAEUSER M, Gardell B . Underload and overload in working life: outline of a multidisciplinary approach. J Human Stress. 1976; 2(3):35-46. DOI: 10.1080/0097840X.1976.9936068. View

Landsbergis P, Choi B, Dobson M, Sembajwe G, Slatin C, Delp L . The Key Role of Work in Population Health Inequities. Am J Public Health. 2018; 108(3):296-297. PMC: 5803831. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304288. View

Burr H . Monitoring trends in psychosocial and physical working conditions: Challenges and suggestions for the 21st century. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021; 47(5):329-333. PMC: 8259709. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3973. View

LaMontagne A, Krnjacki L, Kavanagh A, Bentley R . Psychosocial working conditions in a representative sample of working Australians 2001-2008: an analysis of changes in inequalities over time. Occup Environ Med. 2013; 70(9):639-47. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2012-101171. View

Milner A, Kavanagh A, Krnjacki L, Bentley R, LaMontagne A . Area-level unemployment and perceived job insecurity: evidence from a longitudinal survey conducted in the Australian working-age population. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013; 58(2):171-81. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/met066. View

Gardell B . Scandinavian research on stress in working life. Int J Health Serv. 1982; 12(1):31-41. DOI: 10.2190/K3DH-0AXW-7DCP-GPFM. View

Milner A, Witt K, LaMontagne A, Niedhammer I . Psychosocial job stressors and suicidality: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2017; 75(4):245-253. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104531. View

Wannstrom I, Peterson U, Asberg M, Nygren A, Gustavsson J . Psychometric properties of scales in the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychological and Social Factors at Work (QPS): confirmatory factor analysis and prediction of certified long-term sickness absence. Scand J Psychol. 2008; 50(3):231-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00697.x. View

10.

Madsen I, Nyberg S, Magnusson Hanson L, Ferrie J, Ahola K, Alfredsson L . Job strain as a risk factor for clinical depression: systematic review and meta-analysis with additional individual participant data. Psychol Med. 2017; 47(8):1342-1356. PMC: 5471831. DOI: 10.1017/S003329171600355X. View

11.

Clausen T, Madsen I, Christensen K, Bjorner J, Poulsen O, Maltesen T . The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ): Development, content, reliability and validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018; 45(4):356-369. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3793. View

12.

Ingre M . Excuse me, but did the IPD-work consortium just "falsify" the job-strain model?. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015; 41(5):504-5. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3512. View

13.

Choi B, Schnall P, Landsbergis P, Dobson M, Ko S, Gomez-Ortiz V . Recommendations for individual participant data meta-analyses on work stressors and health outcomes: comments on IPD-Work Consortium papers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015; 41(3):299-311. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3484. View

14.

Waddell A, Kunstler B, Lennox A, Pattuwage L, Grundy E, Tsering D . How effective are interventions in optimizing workplace mental health and well-being? A scoping review of reviews and evidence map. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023; 49(4):235-248. PMC: 10713995. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.4087. View

15.

Taouk Y, Spittal M, LaMontagne A, Milner A . Psychosocial work stressors and risk of all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019; 46(1):19-31. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3854. View

16.

Schulte P, Sauter S, Pandalai S, Tiesman H, Chosewood L, Cunningham T . An urgent call to address work-related psychosocial hazards and improve worker well-being. Am J Ind Med. 2024; 67(6):499-514. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23583. View

17.

Leka S, Jain A, Cox T, Kortum E . The development of the European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF. J Occup Health. 2011; 53(2):137-43. DOI: 10.1539/joh.o10010. View

18.

Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A, Virtanen M, Ferrie J, Batty G, Rugulies R . IPD-Work consortium: pre-defined meta-analyses of individual-participant data strengthen evidence base for a link between psychosocial factors and health. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015; 41(3):312-21. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3485. View

19.

EL BATAWI M . Work-related diseases. A new program of the World Health Organization. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984; 10(6 Spec No):341-6. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2309. View

20.

Schelvis R, Oude Hengel K, Burdorf A, Blatter B, Strijk J, van der Beek A . Evaluation of occupational health interventions using a randomized controlled trial: challenges and alternative research designs. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015; 41(5):491-503. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3505. View