Evaluating the Association of Radiographic Parameters of Proximal Humerus Fractures Managed Conservatively with Functional Outcomes

Overview

Journal Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2024 Aug 6

PMID 39105844

Authors

Joshua Song

Lim Chien Joo

Low Chee Chung Jonathan

Sean Wei Loong Ho

Ivan Chua

Ernest Beng Kee Kwek

Bryan Yijia Tan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment of proximal humerus fractures remains controversial. Understanding the factors that can affect the long-term functional outcomes can aid with management choices. This primary aim of this paper is to evaluate the association of radiographic parameters with functional outcomes.

Methods: Radiographic parameters [Caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angles, Y-scapular angles, and humeral head height (HHH)] were studied. The patients were split into varus and valgus groups based on the CCD angles and retroverted and anteverted groups based on Y-scapular angles. Functional outcome was measured by Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), and quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at 1 year follow-up. Intra- and interrater reliability were measured with the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis and logistic regression analysis defined the optimal value for abnormalities on radiographic evaluation as an outcome predictor.

Results: 111 patients were recruited (mean age 69, 78% female). Median final radiographic assessment was at 7 months. Mean initial/final CCD was 119 /111 (varus, n = 36) and 153/140 (valgus, n = 75). Mean initial/final Y-scapula angle was 27/27 (retroversion, n = 101) and 70/40 (anteversion, n = 9). There was a significant relationship between OSS and final Y-scapular angle in the retroverted group (adj coeff 0.034, p = 0.009) with optimum predictive retroversion angulation of 25 predicting poor functional outcome (OSS < 40), area under the ROC curve of 0.614. Higher initial valgus and retroversion significantly predicted more change in the final angle (adj coeff - 0.349, p = 0.002, adj coeff - 0.527, p < 0.001 respectively). Both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for the radiographic parameters were excellent (ICC > 0.9).

Conclusion: Radiographic parameters whilst having excellent reliability, have a limited ability to predict short-term functional recovery. The extent of retroversion is the most important predictor for functional recovery with 25 a cut-off guide. Fractures with a higher initial valgus and retroversion tend to displace more.

References

Burke M, Minnock C, Robbins C, Abbott M, Caird M, Farley F . Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Radiographic Analysis of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017; 39(2):e125-e129. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001083. View

Clement N, Duckworth A, McQueen M, Court-Brown C . The outcome of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: predictors of mortality and function. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(7):970-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32894. View

Court-Brown C, Caesar B . Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006; 37(8):691-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. View

Court-Brown C, McQueen M . The impacted varus (A2.2) proximal humeral fracture: prediction of outcome and results of nonoperative treatment in 99 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2005; 75(6):736-40. DOI: 10.1080/00016470410004111. View

Frank F, Niehaus R, Borbas P, Eid K . Risk factors for secondary displacement in conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B(7):881-889. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2020-0045.R1. View

Goldberg R, Williamson D, Hoyen H, Liu R . Humeral version and neck-shaft angle correlated with demographic parameters in a study of 1104 cadaveric humeri. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(6):1236-1241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.009. View

Hanley J, McNeil B . The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982; 143(1):29-36. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. View

Hanley J, McNeil B . A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983; 148(3):839-43. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708. View

Hengg C, Mayrhofer P, Euler S, Wambacher M, Blauth M, Kralinger F . The relevance of neutral arm positioning for true ap-view X-ray to provide true projection of the humeral head shaft angle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 136(2):213-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2368-6. View

10.

Hodgson S, Mawson S, Saxton J, Stanley D . Rehabilitation of two-part fractures of the neck of the humerus (two-year follow-up). J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(2):143-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.003. View

11.

Jayakumar P, Teunis T, Williams M, Lamb S, Ring D, Gwilym S . Factors associated with the magnitude of limitations during recovery from a fracture of the proximal humerus: predictors of limitations after proximal humerus fracture. Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B(6):715-723. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-0857.R1. View

12.

Jia X, Chen Y, Qiang M, Zhang K, Li H, Jiang Y . Postoperative Evaluation of Reduction Loss in Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Comparison of Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography. Orthop Surg. 2017; 9(2):167-173. PMC: 6584099. DOI: 10.1111/os.12332. View

13.

Kruithof R, Formijne Jonkers H, van der Ven D, van Olden G, Timmers T . Functional and quality of life outcome after non-operatively managed proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017; 18(4):423-430. PMC: 5685986. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-017-0468-5. View

14.

Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber K . Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17(1):42-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.016. View

15.

Matheron G, Mahoney M, Domos P . Conservative treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures: Can poor outcomes be predicted?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(4):2031-2040. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03890-1. View

16.

Murachovsky J, Ikemoto R, Nascimento L, Fujiki E, Milani C, Warner J . Pectoralis major tendon reference (PMT): a new method for accurate restoration of humeral length with hemiarthroplasty for fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15(6):675-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.12.011. View

17.

Poeze M, Lenssen A, Van Empel J, Verbruggen J . Conservative management of proximal humeral fractures: can poor functional outcome be related to standard transscapular radiographic evaluation?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 19(2):273-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.066. View