» Articles » PMID: 39104811

Is Intraoperative Parathyroid Monitoring During Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy Still Justified?

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Aug 6
PMID 39104811
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is the third most common endocrine disease. With parathyroidectomy, a cure rate of over 95% at initial surgery is reported. Localization of the abnormal parathyroid gland is critical for the operation to be successful. The aim of this study is to analyze data of patients with single gland disease (SGD) and positive concordant localization imaging undergoing minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring (IOPTH) to evaluate if IOPTH is still justified in patients with localized SGD.

Methods: A retrospective database analysis of all minimally invasive operations with IOPTH for PHPT and positive concordant localization in ultrasound (US) and Tc-sestamibi scintigraphy (MIBI) between 2016-2021. When both US and MIBI were negative, patients underwent either choline or methionine PET-CT. The patients were also analyzed a second time without applying IOPTH.

Results: In total, 198 patients were included in the study. The sensitivity of US, MIBI and PET-CT was 96%, 94% and 100%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 88%, 89% and 94% with US, MIBI and PET-CT, respectively. IOPTH was true positive in 185 (93.4%) patients. In 13 (6.6%) patients, no adequate IOPTH decline was observed after localizing and extirpating the assumed enlarged parathyroid gland. Without IOPTH, the cure rate decreased from 195 (98.5%) to 182 (92%) patients and the rate of persisting disease increased from 2 (1.0%) to 15 (7.5%) patients.

Conclusion: Discontinuing IOPTH significantly increases the persistence rate by a factor of 7.5 in patients with concordantly localized adenoma. Therefore, IOPTH appears to remain necessary even for this group of patients.

References
1.
Barczynski M, Golkowski F, Konturek A, Buziak-Bereza M, Cichon S, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A . Technetium-99m-sestamibi subtraction scintigraphy vs. ultrasonography combined with a rapid parathyroid hormone assay in parathyroid aspirates in preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas and in directing surgical approach. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006; 65(1):106-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02556.x. View

2.
Chen H, Pruhs Z, Starling J, Mack E . Intraoperative parathyroid hormone testing improves cure rates in patients undergoing minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Surgery. 2005; 138(4):583-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.046. View

3.
Wilhelm S, Wang T, Ruan D, Lee J, Asa S, Duh Q . The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for Definitive Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism. JAMA Surg. 2016; 151(10):959-968. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2310. View

4.
Riss P, Scheuba C, Asari R, Bieglmayer C, Niederle B . Is minimally invasive parathyroidectomy without QPTH monitoring justified?. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009; 394(5):875-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-009-0505-9. View

5.
Prager G, Czerny C, Ofluoglu S, Kurtaran A, Passler C, Kaczirek K . Impact of localization studies on feasibility of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in an endemic goiter region. J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 196(4):541-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01897-5. View