» Articles » PMID: 39103575

Using a Measurement Type-independent Metric to Compare Patterns of Determinants Between Patient-reported Versus Performance-based Physical Function in Hemodialysis Patients

Abstract

Purpose: We applied a previously established common T-score metric for patient-reported and performance-based physical function (PF), offering the unique opportunity to directly compare measurement type-specific patterns of associations with potential laboratory-based, psychosocial, sociodemographic, and health-related determinants in hemodialysis patients.

Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the CONVINCE trial (N = 1,360), a multinational randomized controlled trial comparing high-flux hemodialysis with high-dose hemodiafiltration. To explore the associations of potential determinants with performance-based versus patient-reported PF, we conducted multiple linear regression (backward elimination with cross-validation and Lasso regression). We used standardized T-scores as estimated from the PROMIS PF short-form 4a (patient-reported PF) and the Physical Performance Test (performance-based PF) as dependent variables.

Results: Performance-based and patient-reported PF were both significantly associated with a laboratory marker-based indicator of muscle mass (simplified creatinine index), although the effects were relatively small (partial f = 0.04). Age was negatively associated with PF; the effect size was larger for performance-based (partial f = 0.12) than for patient-reported PF (partial f = 0.08). Compared to performance-based PF, patient-reported PF showed a stronger association with self-reported health domains, particularly pain interference and fatigue. When using the individual difference between patient-reported and performance-based T-scores as outcome, we found that younger age and more fatigue were associated with lower patient-reported PF compared to performance-based PF (small effect size).

Conclusion: Patient-reported and performance-based assessments were similarly associated with an objective marker of physical impairment in hemodialysis patients. Age and fatigue may result in discrepancies when comparing performance-based and patient-reported scores on the common PF scale. Trial Registration CONVINCE is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (Register ID: NL64750.041.18). The registration can be accessed at: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/52958 .

References
1.
Frez A, Regina Alouche S, Binda A, Vieira G, Bueno B, Cabral C . Development of a Core Set for Knee Dysfunction Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A Cross-sectional Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 102(4):571-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.139. View

2.
van Tuyl L, Boers M . Patient-reported outcomes in core domain sets for rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015; 11(12):705-12. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.116. View

3.
Ahmed S, Berzon R, Revicki D, Lenderking W, Moinpour C, Basch E . The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Med Care. 2012; 50(12):1060-70. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268aaff. View

4.
Kluetz P, Slagle A, Papadopoulos E, Johnson L, Donoghue M, Kwitkowski V . Focusing on Core Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Symptomatic Adverse Events, Physical Function, and Disease-Related Symptoms. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(7):1553-8. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2035. View

5.
Tong A, Gill J, Budde K, Marson L, Reese P, Rosenbloom D . Toward Establishing Core Outcome Domains For Trials in Kidney Transplantation: Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Kidney Transplantation Consensus Workshops. Transplantation. 2017; 101(8):1887-1896. PMC: 5604246. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001774. View