Insights Into the Patient Experience of Hormone Therapy for Early Breast Cancer Treatment Using Patient Forum Discussions and Natural Language Processing

Overview

Journal JCO Clin Cancer Inform

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2024 Aug 5

PMID 39102642

Authors

Sameet Sreenivasan

Chao Fang

Emuella M Flood

Natasha Markuzon

Jasmine Y Y Sze

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Understanding the real-world experience of patients with early breast cancer (eBC) is imperative for optimizing outcomes and evolving patient care. However, there is a lack of patient-level data, hindering clinical development. This social listening study was performed to understand patient insights into symptoms and impacts of hormone therapy (HT) for eBC using posts from patient forums on breastcancer.org to inform future clinical research.

Methods: Natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques were used to identify themes related to eBC from a sample of 500,000 posts. After relevant data selection, 362,074 eBC posts were retained for further analysis of symptoms and impacts related to HT, as well as insights into symptom severity, pain locations, and symptom management using exercise and yoga.

Results: Overall, 32 symptoms and nine impacts had significant associations with ≥one HT. Hot flush (relative risk [RR], 6.70 [95% CI, 3.36 to 13.36]), arthralgia (RR, 6.67 [95% CI, 3.53 to 12.59]), weight increased (RR, 4.83 [95% CI, 3.20 to 7.28]), mood swings (RR, 7.36 [95% CI, 5.75 to 9.42]), insomnia (RR, 4.76 [95% CI, 3.14 to 7.22]), and depression (RR, 3.05 [95% CI, 1.71 to 5.44]) demonstrated the strongest associations. Severe headache, dizziness, back pain, and muscle spasms showed significant associations with ≥one HT despite their low overall prevalence in eBC posts.

Conclusion: The social listening approach allowed the identification of real-world insights from posts specific to eBC HT from a large-scale online breast cancer forum that captured experiences from a uniquely diverse group of patients. Using NLP has a potential to scale analysis of patient feedback and reveal actionable insights into patient experiences of treatment that can inform the development of future therapies and improve the care of patients with eBC.

References

Chlebowski R, Geller M . Adherence to endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Oncology. 2007; 71(1-2):1-9. DOI: 10.1159/000100444. View

Franti P, Sieranoja S, Wikstrom K, Laatikainen T . Clustering Diagnoses From 58 Million Patient Visits in Finland Between 2015 and 2018. JMIR Med Inform. 2022; 10(5):e35422. PMC: 9118010. DOI: 10.2196/35422. View

Lasch K, Marquis P, Vigneux M, Abetz L, Arnould B, Bayliss M . PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Qual Life Res. 2010; 19(8):1087-96. PMC: 2940042. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6. View

Law E, Auil M, Spears P, Berg K, Winnette R . Voice Analysis of Cancer Experiences Among Patients With Breast Cancer: VOICE-BC. J Patient Exp. 2021; 8:23743735211048058. PMC: 8521423. DOI: 10.1177/23743735211048058. View

Halkett G, Arbon P, Scutter S, Borg M . The phenomenon of making decisions during the experience of early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007; 16(4):322-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00778.x. View

Aiello Bowles E, Boudreau D, Chubak J, Yu O, Fujii M, Chestnut J . Patient-reported discontinuation of endocrine therapy and related adverse effects among women with early-stage breast cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2013; 8(6):e149-57. PMC: 3500489. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000543. View

Humphrey L, Willgoss T, Trigg A, Meysner S, Kane M, Dickinson S . A comparison of three methods to generate a conceptual understanding of a disease based on the patients' perspective. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018; 1(1):9. PMC: 5934934. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-017-0013-6. View

Cimiano P, Collins B, De Vuono M, Escudier T, Gottowik J, Hartung M . Patient listening on social media for patient-focused drug development: a synthesis of considerations from patients, industry and regulators. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1274688. PMC: 10955474. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1274688. View

Findley A, Sharma G, Bentley S, Arbuckle R, Patalano F, Naujoks C . Comparison of Literature Review, Social Media Listening, and Qualitative Interview Research Methods in Generating Patient-Reported Symptom and Functional Impact Concepts of Presbyopia. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022; 12(1):501-516. PMC: 9834465. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-022-00620-w. View

10.

Peddie N, Agnew S, Crawford M, Dixon D, MacPherson I, Fleming L . The impact of medication side effects on adherence and persistence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Breast. 2021; 58:147-159. PMC: 8165559. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.05.005. View

11.

Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rubio I . Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30(8):1194-1220. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz173. View

12.

Partridge A, LaFountain A, Mayer E, Taylor B, Winer E, Asnis-Alibozek A . Adherence to initial adjuvant anastrozole therapy among women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(4):556-62. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.5451. View

13.

Bakoyiannis I, Tsigka E, Perrea D, Pergialiotis V . The Impact of Endocrine Therapy on Cognitive Functions of Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Clin Drug Investig. 2015; 36(2):109-18. DOI: 10.1007/s40261-015-0364-9. View

14.

Harrow A, Dryden R, McCowan C, Radley A, Parsons M, Thompson A . A hard pill to swallow: a qualitative study of women's experiences of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(6):e005285. PMC: 4067895. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005285. View

15.

Rothman M, Gnanaskathy A, Wicks P, Papadopoulos E . Can we use social media to support content validity of patient-reported outcome instruments in medical product development?. Value Health. 2015; 18(1):1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.001. View

16.

Fang C, Markuzon N, Patel N, Rueda J . Natural Language Processing for Automated Classification of Qualitative Data From Interviews of Patients With Cancer. Value Health. 2022; 25(12):1995-2002. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.004. View

17.

Malterud K . Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001; 358(9280):483-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6. View

18.

van Herk-Sukel M, van de Poll-Franse L, Voogd A, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Coebergh J, Herings R . Half of breast cancer patients discontinue tamoxifen and any endocrine treatment before the end of the recommended treatment period of 5 years: a population-based analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 122(3):843-51. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0724-3. View

19.

Ricci L, Lanfranchi J, Lemetayer F, Rotonda C, Guillemin F, Coste J . Qualitative Methods Used to Generate Questionnaire Items: A Systematic Review. Qual Health Res. 2018; 29(1):149-156. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318783186. View

20.

Siegel R, Miller K, Fuchs H, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022; 72(1):7-33. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21708. View