» Articles » PMID: 39101152

Association of Auditory Interference and Ocular-Motor Response with Subconcussive Head Impacts in Adolescent Football Players

Overview
Journal Neurotrauma Rep
Date 2024 Aug 5
PMID 39101152
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether neuro-ophthalmological function, as assessed by the King-Devick test (KDT), alters during a high school football season and to explore the role of auditory interference on the sensitivity of KDT. During the 2021 and 2022 high school football seasons, football players' neuro-ophthalmological function was assessed at five time points (preseason, three in-season, postseason), whereas control athletes were assessed at preseason and postseason. Two-hundred ten football players and 80 control athletes participated in the study. The year 1 cohort ( = 94 football, = 10 control) was tested with a conventional KDT, whereas the year 2 cohort ( = 116 football, = 70 control) was tested with KDT while listening to loud traffic sounds to induce auditory interference. There were improvements in KDT during a season among football players, regardless of conventional KDT (preseason 53.4 ± 9.3 vs. postseason 46.4 ± 8.5 sec; β = -1.7, SE = 0.12, < 0.01) or KDT with auditory interference (preseason 52.3 ± 11.5 vs. postseason 45.1 ± 9.5 sec; β = -1.7, SE = 0.11, < 0.001). The degree of improvement was similar between the tests, with no significant group-by-time interaction (β = -0.08, SE = 0.17, = 0.65). The control athletes also improved KDT performance at a similar degree as the football cohorts in both KDT conditions. Our data suggest that KDT performance improves during a season, regardless of auditory interference or head impact exposure. KDT performance was not impacted by a noisy environment, supporting its sideline utility for screening more severe forms of injury.

References
1.
Bailes J, Petraglia A, Omalu B, Nauman E, Talavage T . Role of subconcussion in repetitive mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2013; 119(5):1235-45. DOI: 10.3171/2013.7.JNS121822. View

2.
Alais D, Morrone C, Burr D . Separate attentional resources for vision and audition. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 273(1592):1339-45. PMC: 1560294. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3420. View

3.
Wahn B, Konig P . Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent?. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017; 13(1):83-96. PMC: 5405449. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0209-2. View

4.
Rizzo J, Hudson T, Dai W, Desai N, Yousefi A, Palsana D . Objectifying eye movements during rapid number naming: Methodology for assessment of normative data for the King-Devick test. J Neurol Sci. 2016; 362:232-9. PMC: 4821571. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.045. View

5.
Slemmer J, Weber J . The extent of damage following repeated injury to cultured hippocampal cells is dependent on the severity of insult and inter-injury interval. Neurobiol Dis. 2005; 18(3):421-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.09.022. View